• Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    5 months ago

    I just hope federal services (like applying for a passport) don’t become Twitter-only after Trump appoints Elon as Secretary of Enshittification.

  • Juice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    5 months ago

    Bummer that isn’t mastodon but any inconvenience to musk is appreciated

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I say this as someone who likes fediverse microblogging (Mastodon, MissKey, etc) it will never be Mastodon. Mastodon and its maintainers are staunchly against all the things that would make it a viable replacement to Twitter.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They don’t like algorithms. They want you to select which content you see.

          That’s all I’ve got. Mastodon is a better, more open tech. And it’s pretty easy to get set up, relatively. It’s insane that companies haven’t jumped on it.

          You don’t even have to quit Twitter. You can just post to more than one place and give people the option.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            This is what happens when someone can’t put themselves into their user’s shoes and then wonder why a product isn’t doing as well as it is.

            They proclaim the product is great, it’s everyone else that’s the problem

  • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    Countdown until it turns out that everybody associated with any competition to Musk’s companies just so happens to be a criminal Trump siccs his DOJ after: 5… 4…

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    X will likely merge with TruthSocial as the defacto Conservative/Right-wing social media site (named something dumb like “XTruthXSocialX”), while BlueSky will become the defacto Liberal social media site.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That would be great - much better than the current situation where twitter is run like a right-wing site but still has people from across the political spectrum hanging out there due to inertia.

    • cable@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Can you imagine taking X (formerly Twitter) public again with a merger with $DJT? Holy smokes.

        • cable@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          If anything they’ll be able to do it, as well as bringing up some already half-dead stocks back to life and fuck some hedge funds that thought they hit the jackpot… call it the M&A era of America

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let’s replace one proprietary service with another. It looks so good with its API wide open, like it’s never getting enshittified.

  • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    These kind of articles always remind me whenever a new MMORPG launched, and then people claimed it would be the World of Warcraft killer.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      On the other hand, the track record of old social networks is not great.

      And it’s reasonable to posit Twitter is deep into the enshitifiication cycle.

      • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Depends what “side” you’re on and what content you choose to engage with I guess.

        Because features wise it’s better than ever I’d say, I’m not even sure what stuff they added or removed that would’ve made the platform worse.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’d posit the algorithm has turned it into a monster.

          Attention should be dictated more by chronological order and what others retweet, not what some black box thinks will keep you glued to the screen, and it felt like more of the former in the old days. This is a subtle, but also very significant change.

      • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most definitely.

        It’s seen better days and current expansion is kinda meh, but it’s still leading the amount of active players by a lot over all other MMO games.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ha ha ha, yeah, sure. Bluesky won’t defeat xitter, at best it’ll just be the “next thing” once xitter finally finishes getting rid of most of its users, which I guess will take more than 4 years from now.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The great thing about BlueSky is how under-the-radar its flown for the last few years. Virtually no advertising. No legions of bot accounts spamming with invites and generic attention baiting posts. No |>u33y N |3io blowing up my mentions. No enshittification, because its just a primitive clone of the original Bird Site.

      The more popular it gets, the less likely that’ll last. BlueSky won’t defeat Twitter until it becomes Twitter.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        My issue with BS is it took VC money from crypto bros.

        What do we think will happen when they come looking for their returns on investment?

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Please, let’s not do this. Lets just enjoy sites that aren’t toxic without making them toxic by written articles with headlines like this.

  • Lila_Uraraka@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    And I’ll be right there with Bluesky, it’s so much better on every issue, significantly fewer bots, no ads, no premium version, and no AI

      • rational_lib@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Non-billionaire controlled so far. It’s a public benefit corporation, which is vulnerable to being Altmaned. Once it becomes valuable money will find a way.

        • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s where the federated angle comes in. Not quite there yet, but as the network grows the vulnerability to the original node getting taken over by a bad actor lessens.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            A feature that makes it easier for their users to migrate to a competitor? Blockchain Capital invests $15M in BlueSky. Insert that Anakin / Padme meme:

            Anakin: Now that we’ve invested, let’s make that federation feature priority 0
            Padme: As in highest priority, right?
            Anakin:
            Padme: As in highest priority, right?

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Is blue sky federated? I thought it was another closed garden. If slightly more open than Twitter.

            • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Bluesky grew out of a project at twitter whose goal was to create a federated protocol. Then when they were split off from twitter when Musk took over they had to start their own twitter-style platform to be the first player in that federated protocol. Now that that part is running they’re gradually building out the originally planned system of allowing more servers to be part of the federation: https://docs.bsky.app/docs/advanced-guides/federation-architecture

      • portuga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        No. Just the same shit with less users. Let it grow (by the millions as lemmy is trying to convince us) and you’ll see. I say we get back to smoke signals

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’ve started removing trash sites. I blocked twatter and reddit at my router.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Soooooooo…what happens whenever X eventually dies? Does Bluesky just defederate, and say “Haha! It is I who has the most audience, therefore I who dictate the industry!”

    Hot or not was a thing until friendster was a thing.

    Friendster was a thing, until myspace was a thing.

    Myspace was a thing until facebook was a thing.

    We’ve seen this line of ups and downs before. Eventually Twitter will be replaced. And then the new thing will be around. As of right now, Bluesky is “federated”, but it REALLY feels like they don’t want to be. Drop of a hat, and they’re defederated. Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t see it.

    I want you to imagine signing up for a service that has extroplatratinated defubulinators. And everybody on the service is taking full advantage of it. But you haven’t signed up yet, so your defubulinator needs to be created and calibrated before you can gain anything from it. Now imagine if you had no idea what extroplatratinated defubulinators even were, and you weren’t being given any indication what they do, or how to use them. Imagine you had no idea what I was even talking about. And imagine what you would do if search engines wouldn’t help you figure it out. But here I am, ranting and raving about how much better it is for you than traditional methods. But you couldn’t find ANYONE who used it, or knew what I was talking about either.

    So now you just keep living life. Never again taking what I said serious.

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m not sure it will, and I don’t really want it to. Twitter is a shithole in part because of the userbase. If Twitter dies, the users will move to Bluesky and make that shitty too. I’m already seeing porn bots appearing in my feeds with as small a userbase as there is!

    • Lila_Uraraka@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s valid, luckily, Threads seems to be taking all the alt right extremists, Mastodon is taking all the programmers, and Bluesky is taking all the furries and LGBTQ

  • BMTea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    It needs A) same functionality B) ban all forms of racism, especially Zionism and C) refuse investment from undemocratic nations like GCC or China

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      yeah I don’t think a usa based platform is really “long gaming” the fee speech problem. Bluesky now shifting to monetization plans. Its a matter of time until some rich dildo buys it up. If were lucky it will be mark cuban or somebody buts its still grim prospects.

      • SuperEars@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        “Fee speech” is a serendipitous typo. Or maybe you meant it. First I’ve heard it, anyway.

      • BMTea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        If I was being honest I’d add “literally anyone whos firm has any connections to a NATO government” but then I’d be called a consoiracy theorist. But as for GCC, that’s a more direct threat to lives of dissidents.