• tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Great. Now I not only have to listen to other people in public talking on their phones but now talking to their glasses.

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why do you need glasses at all for a version with no camera? Can’t someone just wear earbuds in that case? Can’t someone’s regular bluetooth (or even tethered) earbuds just talk to the phone in their pocket to do everything?

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      A glasses with a display were always my dream. But with actually good controls, which it looks like the current iteration of pervert glasses actually have, it’s more than I ever dreamed for. You can display a minimap there, you can do some media control, display relevant info if you’re working on something, speaker’s notes when you do the presentation, the possibilities are numerous.
      If there will be a distinct version without a camera I might actually consider overcoming my hate for Zuck’s bullshit (but more probably I’ll wait for zuckless version)

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I know it is your dream. But, doing a presentation while wearing sunglasses indoor doesn’t exactly transmit humanity, connection nor empathy. I would nope out of that presentation. Everything else is just an app. They are all non-critical things, they don’t require a HUD.

        Anyways, that’s irrelevant because meta glasses don’t have screens. So, no AR functionality.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          They don’t have to be sunglasses. Google glasses worked how many years ago.

          They are all non-critical things

          I mean, nothing strictly speaking is. But having hands-free screen actually opens some nice possibilities that holding a phone in your hand doesn’t afford.

          Anyways, that’s irrelevant because meta glasses don’t have screens. So, no AR functionality.

          Wait, they don’t? What the fuck is the point then.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            To be a creepy perv. It was obvious since first revealed.

            Also, Google glasses were just as creepy. Thy worked in the technical sense. Complete social and market failure though.

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Also, Google glasses were just as creepy.

              I mean yeah, but again, remove a camera and it’s actually a very useful product for a very specific purpose.

          • OrgunDonor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I will say the point, it is an extension of your phone essentially. A very expensive, pointless, and ultimately creepy extension.

            It’s like buying a smart watch, so you can ask it stuff, and not use anything else it can do. When your phone can probably still listen to you perfectly fine.

  • fartographer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “Oh, don’t worry, these are actually the Meta Glasses Freedom©®™. They’re actually pretty innovative! I can go off-grid while still feeling so connected to all my feeds! Instead of recording to the cloud, I can use my new Freedoms©®™ to record moments directly to my brain using the new Facebook BAM technology. Yup, these babies don’t have a single semiconductor, but Zuck still managed to somehow run Brain Access Memory on them! The best part is how cheap they are! Nearly half the price, and you get a 10% discount on their AI subscription since these glasses don’t actually transfer any data. But that subscription lets the Meta Glasses Freedom©®™ assist me with directly accessing memories whether the glasses were present or not! It’s a pretty sweet deal, if you really think about it.”

    • iLStrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      No. Glasses with always-on microphones, internet connectivity and logging everything anyone is doing themselves + the people around them. So not much better than the current ones.

    • BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Not unless your normal glasses do all this: “The camera-free glasses, code-named Luna, will still feature an array of six microphones to allow users to speak to the company’s AI chatbot and its recently-released AI assistant, called Muse. They’ll presumably pick up audio from users’ environments as well, where bystanders may not be aware of the eavesdropping.”

  • Séimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is still surveillance, just with audio instead of video.

    But this actually creates a new problem: wearers of pervert glasses have plausible deniability. “Are you filming me?” “Who, me? Oh no, these ones don’t have cameras. Trust me”.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      So your telling me I can go into a mirror maze and not be so nervous? Psh, finally found a use case. Wait how much are they?.. nevermind

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    To be fair, this is not that different from the always-on, always-listening phones in everyone’s hands now.

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        In what way?

        Are we assuming that phones aren’t listening all the time and glasses are?

        Or that you can theoretically turn off always listening on phones but not on glasses?

        Or that the phones are Apple / Google / Samsung, etc, but the glasses are Meta, so that’s different?

        Or just that phones are already out of the barn, and one listening device per person is bad enough, but glasses we will have a chance to regulate with common sense data privacy laws?

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            34 minutes ago

            Where? Are you talking about the camera version or the mic-only version?

            One other argument i can think of is that with phones, it is suspected that they are passing what they listen to up to cloud servers for ads and stuff, but hard to confirm.

            With the glasses they will definitely be sending data from microphone to Meta’s servers.

        • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I mean, your phone isn’t constantly pointing his cameras at other people’s face and using meta’s database to gather information on the people you’re filming, that’s already a big difference.

          Then you have different options to deGAFAM your phones. I personalky use graphene but I get most people are not there yet.

          Don’t get me wrong, phones are obviously the most common spying devices out there, but jt’s definitely not to the level of these dystopian glasses.

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            That is a good point about having graphene as an option on some phones.

            I was talking about the version of the glasses that will be sold without cameras.