People murder their children every 5 days in America. That means that 265 people have wiped out their families since Casey killed her kids. In almost all cases, the father is the perpetrator. Do you know the names, or faces of any of those hundreds of men?
Casey killed her kids because she was nuts. Not even the prosecution disputes this.
People hate her because misogyny and ableism. If she was a man and did it for insurance money, this would barely make the local news.
She was able to control and strangle her three children to death. I feel bad because there’s a documented path of attempting to seek mental heath.
Let’s be real if this wasn’t a white woman it would likely be a max sentence verdict. This was a horrific crime, the type of shit that gets minors charged as adults.
It’s become a huge story because of the support and empathy that she’s getting, while the other cases of infanticide don’t receive attention or support (and rightfully so).
Still doesn’t make the choice for babysitter any easier
it’s a huge case because it’s a proxy for the gender war and extremists on both sides have trumpted it as loud as they possibly can. like the bozos here pushing false claims about the evidence.
most normal folks think she’s nuts and should be jailed like anyone else who kills her kids.
the insane people think she should be set free and isn’t guilty, even though she confessed and all the evidence is clear she did the crime. and many of them claim it was the dad that did it because only men can be evil, and if she did do it, he forced her to do it with psychic powers.
the subtle of court case, whether she is criminally liable for her actions, is completely lost the vast majority of folks, especially the insane people.
Not speaking for them, as I don’t know exactly what they meant. But I suspect they meant misogyny in the sense that the ratio of female to male coverage of similar scenarios playing out would lead you to assume there would be an equal amount of male father killing his children coverage, but we don’t see that reflected in reality.
I suspect that’s the media’s fault more than anything else.
The case is heavily publicized because 1) many woman relate to a lack of postpartum support in this country and 2) the not guilty by reason of insanity plea which hinges on a 18 minute psychotic break resulting in three murders and is inconsistent with current medical understanding of postpartum psychosis.
The question is whether they’ll be able to offset the blame onto the medical establishment and answer seems to be yes, as it seems several of the medical professionals involved in her case may be successfully sued for malpractice.
Within the medical community the case has already changed the practice of many clinicians relating to post partum psychiatric care unfortunately being less likely to be accepted by a practice (and referred to often scarcely available specialized centers) or the threshold to institutionalize patients against their will is now lower given the concern that they may be a danger to their community and that any criminal act theyay engage in could be later framed on their treatment team.
When the crime is strictly a parent killing their children its about 50/50 this is called filicide. You’re conflating family annihilation with filicide. Your source supports my claim not yours. There have been more than double instances of filicide vs familicide in the same span. I don’t know the names of any of the men or women. Again women being around half that number. You are talking about a different crime. Especially considering those are almost always very open and shut whereas this has lots of strange intricacies. The prosecution absolutely disputes she is/was insane at the time of the crime. That’s literally the entire case. They even brought medical professionals involved her treatment to dispute the fact she was insane. Are you sure your angle isn’t rooted in misandry? That last claim I made has the exact same amount of merit your claims about ableism and misogyny do. Which is very little. I believe she should be in a psychiatric hospital for the rest of her life, not general prison. The false narrative that she is either going to be found innocent or guilty is what’s mudding the waters. She’s either going to prison or a hospital upon retrial, period. This is in the news in part because it distracts from Trump raping kids and the general shit show happening. As well as the fact its just an interesting case with a ton of layers.
People murder their children every 5 days in America. That means that 265 people have wiped out their families since Casey killed her kids. In almost all cases, the father is the perpetrator. Do you know the names, or faces of any of those hundreds of men?
Casey killed her kids because she was nuts. Not even the prosecution disputes this.
People hate her because misogyny and ableism. If she was a man and did it for insurance money, this would barely make the local news.
She was able to control and strangle her three children to death. I feel bad because there’s a documented path of attempting to seek mental heath.
Let’s be real if this wasn’t a white woman it would likely be a max sentence verdict. This was a horrific crime, the type of shit that gets minors charged as adults.
(Insert gender war here)
I kind of disagree
It’s become a huge story because of the support and empathy that she’s getting, while the other cases of infanticide don’t receive attention or support (and rightfully so).
Still doesn’t make the choice for babysitter any easier
it’s a huge case because it’s a proxy for the gender war and extremists on both sides have trumpted it as loud as they possibly can. like the bozos here pushing false claims about the evidence.
most normal folks think she’s nuts and should be jailed like anyone else who kills her kids.
the insane people think she should be set free and isn’t guilty, even though she confessed and all the evidence is clear she did the crime. and many of them claim it was the dad that did it because only men can be evil, and if she did do it, he forced her to do it with psychic powers.
the subtle of court case, whether she is criminally liable for her actions, is completely lost the vast majority of folks, especially the insane people.
Not speaking for them, as I don’t know exactly what they meant. But I suspect they meant misogyny in the sense that the ratio of female to male coverage of similar scenarios playing out would lead you to assume there would be an equal amount of male father killing his children coverage, but we don’t see that reflected in reality.
I suspect that’s the media’s fault more than anything else.
The case is heavily publicized because 1) many woman relate to a lack of postpartum support in this country and 2) the not guilty by reason of insanity plea which hinges on a 18 minute psychotic break resulting in three murders and is inconsistent with current medical understanding of postpartum psychosis.
The question is whether they’ll be able to offset the blame onto the medical establishment and answer seems to be yes, as it seems several of the medical professionals involved in her case may be successfully sued for malpractice.
Within the medical community the case has already changed the practice of many clinicians relating to post partum psychiatric care unfortunately being less likely to be accepted by a practice (and referred to often scarcely available specialized centers) or the threshold to institutionalize patients against their will is now lower given the concern that they may be a danger to their community and that any criminal act theyay engage in could be later framed on their treatment team.
When the crime is strictly a parent killing their children its about 50/50 this is called filicide. You’re conflating family annihilation with filicide. Your source supports my claim not yours. There have been more than double instances of filicide vs familicide in the same span. I don’t know the names of any of the men or women. Again women being around half that number. You are talking about a different crime. Especially considering those are almost always very open and shut whereas this has lots of strange intricacies. The prosecution absolutely disputes she is/was insane at the time of the crime. That’s literally the entire case. They even brought medical professionals involved her treatment to dispute the fact she was insane. Are you sure your angle isn’t rooted in misandry? That last claim I made has the exact same amount of merit your claims about ableism and misogyny do. Which is very little. I believe she should be in a psychiatric hospital for the rest of her life, not general prison. The false narrative that she is either going to be found innocent or guilty is what’s mudding the waters. She’s either going to prison or a hospital upon retrial, period. This is in the news in part because it distracts from Trump raping kids and the general shit show happening. As well as the fact its just an interesting case with a ton of layers.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24529774/