It’s fundamentally impossible to watermark digital data permanently without controlling the hardware so the only answer here is to use brain.
I suspect hardware watermarking market will emerge as those types of watermarks are much harder to remove. I.e. the phone camera uses cryptography to sign that this picture was taken by a real phone. So proof will be inverted and that might actually be a good thing.
But brain no good! Good brain bad!
We don’t… That’s the new reality we live in and it happened so fast my head hurts
Reverse image search? If it had a watermark then it’s probably been posted somewhere before. If it hasn’t, then no you can’t really know. You can get a sense for common AI styles and features, but unless the original artist posted it somewhere, in certain cases you’re just guessing.
Did you worry about photoshops too? Because many of those were absolutely hard to tell
Not true. If it looks shopped I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.
Be careful of falling victim to bad toupees.
You always know when you spot a bad fake, but you have no idea how many good fakes flew right past your radar. We tend to think we’re much better at these things than we really are.
Then you will learn same skill for slop most likely
mathmatically you won’t.
If you can’t tell does it matter?
the point is, even if photoshop is detectable AI slop eventually won’t be
So you are saying an Ai can be as creative and intuitive as a person?
I’m saying most people are dumb as fuck
You’ve never seen an expert
Go see art in real life. It’s all original content.
I drop musical artists like it’s hot the moment I find out they support Israel. I’m not opposed to doing the same for AI.
We can’t tell the difference anymore - we simply can’t trust anything on social media anymore as it’s mostly not true - also print and broadcast media are equally lies…
Always have been.
If it’s good enough to not know it’s ai then it’s good enough to not be called slop
