• waterbogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The problem isnt the registries per se, it is that they are extremely poorly administered if children are being put on them. The criteria for adding an individual to such registries needs to be strict and with a reasonably high threshold, so that nobody gets on one for things like pissing outside, or accidental exposure, or minors sexting each other, or for accidentally having a few CSAM images that they had downloaded unwittingly etc

    I had some involvement with a local registry some years back, and we only inluded adults who physically offended against minors and with a significant age difference, and adults who were actively and deliberately involved in the production and distribution of copious quantities of CSAM. Most had track records involving multiple offences and multiple victims

    • Morkyporky@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      They shouldn’t exist. If someone is a danger to reoffend they shouldn’t be let out of prision in the first place.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is what you get with a justice system focused on punishment, not justice, and a for profit penal system fixated on money not rehabilitation.

        • waterbogan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          We do the rehabilitation/ treatment thing here. It does not work, at least long term - not surprisingly really given that it is an innate defect of laregly biological origin. The best solution is perhaps not prison per se but some kind of community where they can live somewhat normal lives but are isolated away from children and have filtered net access so there is no possibilty of their reoffending

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    In my state they put you on the sex offender registry if you get caught pissing outside

    • Xariphon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      To my mind, this sort of thing (no pun intended) waters down the entire meaning of the thing.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    Which bullshit and we need to fix that. I remember listening to a podcast about the woman who help create that after her son was taken. She says she regrets the program and wish she never created it because of shit like this.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    We’ll eventually see this period of history as being as extreme with sex crimes as the 80s were with seeing satanic cults everywhere.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      We can add the anti-vaping nutjobs to that list too.

      Anyone screaming “think of the children!” should always be viewed with suspicion.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          2 years ago

          All research shows vaping to be essentially harmless, especially compared with cigarettes. But governments and private interests are pushing to get it banned, taxed, and are otherwise attacking it. All because it “harms children”.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            At its most basic it’s water vapour. You know the one thing you’re not supposed to get in your lungs… water. And you can’t exactly trust what certain research shows, it’s too early in the lifespan of vaping to truly know it’s ramifications. Cigarettes used to have research having then saying they were good for you.

            At the end of the day though, what’s the fucking point of vaping other than to be another addictive substance for those on the bottom to be beholden to, like an addict tax keeping their take home income as low as possible. It’s just not something the world needs, so why defend it? Have you got the addict equivalent of buyers bias or something?

            Edit: okay I’ll concede on the water vapour thing. Still don’t want chemicals in my lungs past that though.

            Also to say something else on vapes… I’m fine with it being a stepping stone to get people off cigarettes. The only issue with that is that it’s much more accessible to puff on a vape at any point in the day (as long as it has charge) too the point where someone might actually end up using it way more and at a more concentrated level than what they’d do with cigarettes. It’s not great.

            • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 years ago

              Its not water vapor, nor is it dangerous to inhale water vapor. Vaping is not safe, but you don’t make a very good argument as to why. The person you’re responding too is also partially correct although they are wrong that vaping is completely harmless. People are often led to believe its more harmful that it truly is because health problems relating to black market marijuana cartridges were falsely attributed to normal vapes.

            • loutr@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 years ago

              It’s not water vapor. It’s mainly propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin, plus flavorings and (optionally) nicotine.

            • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Neverminding that it’s not just water vapor, fog and humidity are also water vapor, and yet we breathe them every day. The substance itself isn’t really the issue. Now, it being hot water vapor, at a higher concentration, and carrying more things than just water vapor, you have some points to stand on.

              Harm reduction is also a very real thing. Sure , vaping is another thing for people to be addicted to. People are going to be addicted, almost everyone to something. I’d rather myself or anyone right now be addicted to vapes than cigs, because it’s LESS harmful, at least according to the current consensus. Of COURSE I’d people just not be addicted but that’s a looooong way off. Stepping stones are good things.

            • Someology@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              They are either working for a vape company or so hopelessly addicted they can’t admit negatives.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 years ago

              You know the one thing you’re not supposed to get in your lungs… water.

              What the fuck lol that’s not how anything works

              You’ve never breathed humid air before? That’s water vapor

              And you can’t exactly trust what certain research shows

              WAKE UP SHEEPLE

          • Someology@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Nicotine still has negative health effects, even without tar. It is not harmless. We’ve also had multiple waves of badly manufactured carts with lead contamination, chemicals known to cause lung damage, etc. It harms everyone who vapes. And everyone whose face they blow vape into. But, it at least far less obnoxious than actual cigarettes.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              Nicotine still has negative health effects

              At a similar level to caffeine. Less than Marijuana and much less than alcohol. Essentially harmless.

              We’ve also had multiple waves of badly manufactured carts with lead contamination, chemicals known to cause lung damage, etc.

              Maybe standards regulation is the answer instead of banning? But anyway, it’s a small minority of carts that are poorly made like this.