• Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    27 days ago

    They can’t pass it. They don’t have majority. Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

    I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office? Because it would’ve been actual policy, and they don’t want that. This is political virtue signaling and nothing more.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office?

      bCoS wE dOn’T hAvE tHe mAjOrItY!!

      It’s the usual and convenient excuse that Dems and their neoliberal fans love to use. As if not having a majority in either houses ever stopped Republicans! If the Dems are really serious as an opposition, which they aren’t, then they have to make popular choices-- the kitchen table issues. And not only that, actually impeach and imprison Trump. I think America has to go under a fully fledged dictatorship for Americans to actually know when they see one; kinda like Brazil imprisoning Bolsonaro for trying to overthrow the election, and they are not letting up at all. Because Brazil suffered from decades of dictatorship. Americans did not indict and arrest Trump because they are still arguing whether or not he’s a fascist.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Because raising the minimum wage when the economy was on the verge of collapse from COVID shut downs would have been idiotic?

    • Serinus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      26 days ago

      So according to this there is absolutely nothing the Dems can do right now that would make you happy.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        26 days ago

        You seem surprised that this is how losing trust works. If people don’t trust you will keep your promises, then it doesn’t matter what you promise them.

        That being said, there are thing they can do that are not just virtue signalling.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        First day here?

        Most people here it seems would rather be worse off so they can continue to bitch endlessly than have anything good happen.

        Probably why half tell you voting is useless too even as primaries happen and Zoran is already in office doing things they should like.

        That notwithstanding I’d like to see polling on the matter. Right or wrong I would suspect a majority would be against such a drastic increase making this a loser of an issue.

  • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    I’m far more interested in a wage cap. Top level earner can’t earn more than 10x the lowest level earner in the company. And a it doesn’t matter the amount the wage is, if it isn’t also tied to inflation as we’ll be back fighting this fight again in short order if it isn’t. That of course is take all of this at face value, and pretending it’s not just theater.

    Though overall I would still prefer people rejecting the current business structures and making employee-owned businesses the new way. Go Pirate with the whole thing, everybody works for shares. Unions/Min. Wage are just compromises from realizing the true potential and pay of the working class.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I’m not an expert, but in that case, the company just splits into different sub-companies, no? The manufacturing arm would have a CEO paid in stocks and lower level workers still make nothing.

      • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        That’s where the cap needs to be. There will always be someone capable and willing to take the job without the enormous pay packet. Executive pay is the biggest scam ever created.

        • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          No but you see if we don’t offer 2 million a year AT LEAST we won’t attract too talent!

    • jadetoffee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      there will never be a wage cap under this current neoliberal hellscape. the entire goal of both parties is to make money for their corporate interests

    • aaa999@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      the “the 1%” meme is really anti-class consciousness, rich workers are workers, this individual literally forgot investors exist

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    Democrats pretend to want to do the right thing when they’re not in power.

    When they’re in power, we get more than enough no votes to sink it and tonedeaf celebration of the girlboss energy of Sinema’s thumbs down.

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    When they know it won’t pass, they go big. Honestly they should have gone bigger.

    I hope they prove me wrong, but you won’t see me holding my breath.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    We need a revolution to undo the damage of this administration. Democrats aren’t going to do shit and they’re all owned by the AIPAC Uniparty. This administration has been devastating to our future. Heads need to roll and I haven’t heard any democrats running on real accountability and a hard line against Israel

  • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    This is one of those ask for 100 so you can negotiate down to 50 kind of things isn’t it? Or just a pretend attempt to look good when it’s obviously rejected.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Democrats had all the leverage during the government shutdown and demanded nothing.

    They had the presidency and did nothing.

    But when they have no leverage they start introducing bills which they know will not pass.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Of course.

      Can’t do anything, but gotta look like you’re doing something so they can use it for fodder in the next election

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    Trump white house just posted " 2 kings" and these people still trying to pass fake bills?

    The people of the US need to woke up before it is too late if they want their democracy back, otherwise they can accept the new kingdom.

    I am not sure what he will call it, maybe just Trump

    • Serinus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      26 days ago

      Do you think this is gonna pass? I’m not sure what you expect here.

      If Dems get 56% of seats, this’ll likely pass. (51% isn’t enough because Fetterman is nearly useless).

      For some reason people here really want to focus on the few potential holdouts rather than the 50% or more of Republicans who are the real reason this won’t pass.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    25 days ago

    This is just so some Democrats can claim “supported/worked for higher worker wages” during their next reelection campaign.

  • E_coli42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Just do it on a per-State level. That way blue states can push their minimum wage up without having to worry about pandering to red states. There is a reason we are a federation if States.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I feel like some degree of mandatory minimum requirements established at the federal level that’s adjusted and implemented per state would be the best case scenario. Obviously minimum wage in California or Texas simply shouldn’t be the same as in Ohio or Wyoming. It really should be more reflective of cost of living of the specific location.

      But also, if you leave it completely up to the states with no mandates from the federal level, enjoy seeing $7.25/hr indefinitely in places like Texas.

      • E_coli42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        If that’s what they want to vote for, let them vote for a low minimum wage🤷‍♂️

        Blue States shouldn’t have to be held back because Red States are too busy fighting culture wars to tackle actual problems.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          What part of anything being discussed here is holding back blue states? Blue states generally have higher minimum wage. A nationwide increase of minimum wage would by and large lift red states up while doing little or nothing for many blue states lol

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    27 days ago

    I’m not trying to be a negative Nancy here, but I gotta say, the fact that shit like this has NEVER in my lifetime been introduced when the Democratic Party actually has control of anything is pretty fucking telling.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    This may be for show but that’s more show than they were willing to show 2019-2021. Republicans were throwing out certain to fail bills constantly for at least the last 25 years. It at least throws people a marketing bone and also any that make it out of committee to a floor vote, it puts on record/something to market for/against an elected public servant. Republicans effectively steer public opinion against their own to their advantage for getting stuff passed and who they want into office. Democrats do not.

    It’s one way to craft a publicly recognizable party ideology that the democratic party has failed to build up these last few decades. The we’re not republicans, we looks and sound more professional doesn’t work. Something like this is a major improvement. If it makes it to the floor for a vote, which democrats and republicans will vote against or abstain. We should want that for potential future primary challengers and be encouraging these

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      No it is not. Democrats did plenty of performative theater in the past. They even have a rotating villain cast which will always make sure there are just enough Democrat votes “betraying” the party to make Republican legislation pass.