“But I think one of the issues here is that if you’re going to opine on matters of theology, you’ve got to be careful. You’ve got to make sure it’s anchored in the truth, and that’s one of the things that I try to do, and it’s certainly something I would expect from the clergy, whether they’re Catholic or Protestant,” he added.

The pope and Donald Trump have exchanged barbs over the past several days, with the pope denouncing the war in Iran and Trump responding by saying Leo was “WEAK on crime” and “terrible for Foreign Policy.”

  • Fandangalo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    If a core Catholic belief is the pope is infallible, especially in the domain of theology & religion, then why is Vance saying any of this? Sure seems like his “Catholicism” is name alone or perhaps his faith is more Protestant than he wants to admit. Or, he has values above his faith, and for a Catholic, that seems worse.

    Whatever, Jan.

    Edit: I’m ex-Catholic. I don’t need a theology lesson about the specifics. What the Pope is expressing here is within the domain of church doctrine.

    Stop trying to defend fascists with pedantic details.

    • Astrealix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Not justifying mr couch fucker, but I will point out: modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible when speaking “ex cathedra”, literally “from the chair”, which is also like… weird with different peoples’ opinions on what is ex cathedra. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility

      • Astrealix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        on the other hand, Vance’s “catholicism” doesn’t even match the fucking Bible, so, yknow.

        • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          Well, let’s be real… Catholicism doesn’t match the Bible, either.

          It’s a ridiculous book full of contradictions, so par for the course.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 days ago

        modern Catholic doctrine does not actually say the Pope is infallible. Rather, it is that he is infallible

        • Astrealix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 days ago

          Yeah, pretty much. What, you expected consistency from the religious sect that has consistently had issues with child sexual abuse?

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            I hate to break it to you about other religions, too…

            Obviously the Catholic Church has a systemic problem, and given that it’s one of the largest religions on earth (and their molester shuffling), it’s more universal than in a lot of religions, and I’m not defending them. They’re only unique in scale though.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      If a core Catholic belief is the pope is infallible

      It isn’t. That’s only when the Pope is speaking “ex cathedra” meaning “from the chair” which Pius IX defined as

      when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, [the Bishop of Rome] defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church.

  • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    18 days ago

    Think of all the leaders who told the Pope to fuck off in history. Nothing but great successes. Surely we’re winning.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    18 days ago

    But I think one of the issues here is that if you’re going to opine on matters of theology, you’ve got to be careful. You’ve got to make sure it’s anchored in the truth

    Oh dear, somebody has a lot of catching up to do. Start with Council of Nicea and go from there.

    FUN FACT: Council of Nicea was formed to settle the age old debate of “should priests cut off their balls or not? On the one hand, Jesus said to do so… on the other hand, my balls.”

    • AlexLost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      The other part was to make it a patriarchal church instead of a matriarchal one. The Virgin Mary used to be the holy figure of Christianity, but men didn’t like that.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        Correction, used to be one of the holy figureS, there were other sects with their own favorites (like John the Baptist and many others).

        They also tossed a lot of “in between” and after testimonies (Gospel of Thomas et al I think) and more.

        BUT, the pressing issue was balls.

        Coincidentally, the word “testimony” is derived from the old custom that referred to swearing an oath on your balls (testicles).

        Lots of balls. balls balls balls

        That obsession survives to this day

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it. ~Matthew 19:12

        Not just priests! He that is able to receive it, let him receive it. Castrati and eunochs only recently fell out of favor in the past century

        Christians are surprisingly ignorant of their own history, it’s kinda funny

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          Wow, there really is a passage for everything! New Testament too. Sounds like Christians should be getting busy with the pruning shears. Jesus actually recommends this as a cure for horniness. TBF I guess it would be an effective one.

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      Take him into a backroom with promises of a soft couch.

      Then just fucking shoot him in the head. Lights out. No fanfare. Just gone.

    • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      What funny to watch (I mean, gallows humor funny) is that as Trump gets weaker, the various temptations for Crown Prince Couchfucker to coup him just grow exponentially.

      I like to imagine Trump and Vance sitting across from each other, silently weighing each other up, Trump telling himself shit like “JD owes me everything, he wouldn’t,” and Vance just looking back across at Trump like Trump’s a couch.

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      No, it’s not. He’ll flourish.

      Watch and see!

      We can’t even get rid of Ted Cruz. They stay in office until they are half-dead (see Biden, Mitch, etc.)

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      He’s banking on being POTUS for the back half of Trump’s term. Trump could keel over any day, but if he’s still alive by New Year’s we’ll almost certainly see Vance try to remove him with the 25th. Once he’s in power, he just needs to be less batshit than Trump for two years and he’ll be in a good position to win an election.

  • mrdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    How can he call himself a catholic while disrespecting his own religious leader

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 days ago

    Every member of this administration, past, present, and future, need to be held accountable when this is over. If we don’t do that, then the Constitution, our laws, will continue to erode when the next batch of grifters show up to push the envelope to see how far they can bend and break the rules.

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    My take on this is that the Night of the Long Knives has clearly started in Trump’s inner circle and Vance (sent to no-win scenarios in Hungary and Pakistan while Trump and Rubio were bro-bonding without him) is starting to feel on thin ice.

    So he’s trying to demonstrate how far backwards he can bend over to justify anything Trump decides to crap on Truth Social.

  • finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    I wasn’t aware the Pope was a law enforcement official, or a foreign policy official. Gosh, where would we be without these little gems Trump keeps dropping?

  • dnick@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    Trouble is you can justify anything you want with the Bible.

    Picking a fight with the guy most identified with have some direct line of information with the god of your constituents though?