Good. This shit doesn’t make sense in the first place. Is the fucking highway liable when criminals use it to get to a victim?
This sounds like 1998.
Complete with an Epstein Frequent Flyer in the White House.
It sounds like copyright holder reps were going after ISP’s because they had money and were a large target.
Going after individual copyright violators will be difficult because there’s a lot more of them. It will also be difficult because copyright violators had no money.
It’s almost like the industry needs to re-think how they make income if the music itself can be copied at effectively no cost.
A lot of artists have figured this out already by touring a lot more and putting their music on Bandcamp for cheap distribution. Another option is getting paid for live performances. Sadly the music distribution gatekeepers might need to find new jobs since competing with Bandcamp while maintaining their lifestyle is going to be difficult.
Bands themselves make very little off of sales. That mostly gets eaten up by managers, distributors, and labels. The bands make a lot more money from touring unless they own their own label.
I swore we resolved this decades ago

Wait…good news? In this reality?
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion for a unanimous court.
No, you woke up today in bizarro world. Welcome.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion for a unanimous court.
I had to pinch myself just to be sure I wasn’t dreaming there.
Yeah and it would be a great precedent - if we could trust SCOTUS AT ALL to rule consistently.
But payment processor is liable for payments for illicit goods. How does this logic work?










