Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-224 days agoHow possibly?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down1107
arrow-up1372arrow-down1imageHow possibly?lemmy.worldChippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-224 days agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squareMyVeryRealName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 days agoYes? Racial previlege isn’t exclusive to any gender.
minus-squareMyVeryRealName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 days agoIt’s in the name. “Racial” previlege.
minus-squareChippys_mittens@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 days agoBut why can’t women have it?
Women?
Yes? Racial previlege isn’t exclusive to any gender.
Why not
It’s in the name. “Racial” previlege.
But why can’t women have it?