• Strepto@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    2 years ago

    Are they just hoping that literally no publisher will legally challenge these terms? You can’t just change the terms retroactively without consent and start charging people whatever you want. They’ll lose the instant someone takes them to court over it

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Isn’t this action (removal of the git repo) essentially an admission that:

    • Unity is doing something shady;
    • Unity knows it’s doing something shady;
    • Unity knows when the public sees what they’re doing what they’re doing, it’ll be recognized as totally something shady?
    • Oneobi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes slim, it’s shady.

      In this digital era, you’d have thought they would know that it would leave a trail. Of course, it’s a calculated risk.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sure a lot of people have a copy of the old repo. But I think the point is that it won’t be that easy to track ToS changes.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 years ago

        Postman got flagged as no longer safe to use on corporate hardware after this. Sounds like it’s time to go back to using curl for everything.

      • DeadNinja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nope, I didn’t. But they all being A-holes, show no sign of digging their own graves like Reddit, X, and Unity did.

        Guess they are supervillains then, lol.

        • Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Eh, I’m sure it’s just a matter of time. As people have said above the infinite free money is drying up. That’s a fact that all these corporations have to contend with. The only difference between Twitter and Facebook or Unity and Google is that Twitter and Unity have made their dumb decisions already. Facebook, Google, and others have navigated this fairly well so far. But they are feeling the same pressures that Reddit and Unity did and eventually they will bend to them too.

  • rustyfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The more I read about this mess, the more I believe this is the work of one or multiple CEOs who have absolutely no clue about the field they are in and started giving orders.

    You know what kind of boss I mean. That kind who can’t handle a NO and throws a fit every time they are proven wrong. But you still do as they will, because they are disgusting human beings and you are already in talks with a new workplace.

    • anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      What’s weird to me is that CEOs should know all about accounting and financials. He should have realized that this pricing model is unsustainable for most Unity developers, because many make less than what he’s asking for per install themselves.

      It’s clear that professional CEOs don’t know anything about tech, but this isn’t a tech issue.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        They absolutely do know. They’re well aware of the impact this will have on small devs. That was their goal. They want to price out those free or low cost games that use Unity and never make a profit to avoid paying royalty fees.

        This wasn’t incompetence. It’s straight up malice.

        • c0c0c0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Of course, he may not realize that this dries up one of the largest sources of the Unity developers the clients he does care about uses.

    • andy_wijaya_med@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The problem is, I don’t think the CEO would be in anyway getting the consequences of their actions. Of the company is sinking, they will just “be fired” and get those extra money (like huge amount of money). The company will close and announce bankruptcy. The “person” isn’t punished.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    Corporations might have an iron grip over basically everything in our life, reducing our choices to a minimum, out of necessity, but the fact that they think we’re stupid too, is actually astounding