I remember the teacher calling out “I cant see your screen” constantly and for unfair reasons, on chromeOS you can (frequently on accedent) abuse the security systems made to limit the damage of rouge extensions. Mainly the “no screen sharing on chrome:// and file:// tabs pages”. I also found a glitch that got patched to run the browser part on a higher privlaged UID (possably root? somthing related to OOBE? the lock screen itself? IDK). It was unstable, dangerous for the OS itself and could go to any site you wanted, this account had a blank chrome://policy and no extensions so anything was fair game. That got patched fast tho. My small group of friends still got to keep their chrome://flags changes even after the patch.

Most news threads are posted so often that they die in a week.

Older = Less eyes than when posted. (And thats ok.) For particularly dead subs or the news subs, Less eyes means no eyes.

without a bumping system, fresh eyes will check the first 100ish and say “I have seen everything here” and their clients will mark it as read. I want to see notifications for more than just repliesto my own stuff.

Some subs are so niche/dead and Without markers like replies it can feel demotivating.

I dont want to feel like this.

The military is using a TEXT TRANSFORMER in it’s, “look at and shoot it” machine?

Exactly!

Anyone notice anything off in the promo video

Is the reason (Im assuming you ment) it can’t survive a repeater survive a repeater because it collects and recreates the particle? These cables are ment for logical data transport.

I found This on the same site as @mosiacmango@lemm.ee. Doesn’t sound 100% like their intent (unless whatever is “next” is a place to fill out personal details). However loading a webpage is enherantly at least a little bit risky.

Theres two ways of looking at safe systems,

• People are idiots and will get themselves hurt. The machine should prevent them to keep them safe at all costs.

Or

• without guardrails, people are vulnerable idiots and I am too. Let the machine prevent them until they understand and accept the risk.

As memtioned elsewhere in the thread, political pressure prevents implementation of safe systems. I absolutely love safeguards and being safe because foot guns are nasty. (Its why Rust is a great language.) but I will fight against things clearly created under the former philosophy because it locks people out of their own property. Because sometimes the “safety” is an excuse for controlling behavor.

deleted by creator

non existent options for CLI tools

When writing vanila javascript, it writes loke a newbie. Anything remotely objscure and it will make things up.

Oh. so you are saying they use need to use copyright enforcement tools irreguardless of if it is a valid takedown according to copyright law. NOT that they are trying to invent a legal reason.

so if Im getting this correct, because zuckerburg runs ads, you can claim the usage is always commercial therefore always subject to copyright control. if you want nudity taken down, you must use (and in the process normalize) this easly abusable loophole that contains absolutely no safeguards.

A doll is also designed to be anthropomorphised, to have life projected onto it. Unlike dolls, when someone talks about LLMs as alive, most people have no clue if they are pretending or not. (And marketers take advantage of it!) We are feed a culture that accedentially says “chatGPT + Boston Dynamics robot = Robocop”. Assuming the only fictional part is that we dont have the ability to make it, not that the thing we create wouldn’t be human (or even be need to be human).

reply to me with youtube URLs videos, channels or playlists that you find interesting.

Ive been archiving for years and this looks like it may be the final clean batch I can produce. Feel free to specify other tags that may be useful and I will add them.

the AI “decided” in the same way the dice “decided” to land on 6 and 4 and screw me over. the system made a result using logic and entropy. With AI, some people are just using this informal way of speaking (subconsciously anthropomorphising) while others look at it and genuinely beleave or want to pretend its alive. You can never really know without asking them directly.

Yes, if the intent is confusion, it is pretty minipulative.

How is it on shakey ground, We may for a while just stay niche but active and high quality.

Ot makes no sense,

Oh thats good.

Just wow man

Contributors need to sign the following Contribution License Agreement.

How moral is this license? Im not good with legaleze