A federal judge in West Virginia has given the Trump administration an ultimatum: Stop illegally detaining immigrants or face contempt rulings and “monetary sanctions against responsible officials.”

“Today, the Government continues to wrongfully detain those petitioners without due process,” [Goodwin’s] opinion reads. “Even now the Government incredulously asserts that the federal district courts do not have jurisdiction, that petitioners cannot raise due process violations, and that the Government has authority to mandatorily and indefinitely detain noncitizens in the local jail. The Government is wrong. Judges in this district have said that over and over and over again. I have said it myself.”

  • bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Monetary sanctions? Oh ok, nevermind. They’re not going to do anything.

    Everyone go back to loading magazines and assembling pipe bombs.

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Explicit notice would be finding the assholes in contempt. Maybe if the ICE/Justice Department lawyers dropped their pants and took a crap on the gavel it would result something other than a strongly worded letter.

  • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Lemmy really hates it when people with legal authority actually use that authority to do something. I guess they’d prefer if they all just rolled over and let the Nazis win.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They’re not doing anything. They’re merely saying they could do something in the future

      Don’t listen to what people say, watch what they do

      If the judges handing out these warnings agreed with the illegal detentions, but didn’t want to explicitly break the law themselves, what would they do differently? I don’t think anything. If they wanted these illegal detentions to happen, while still covering their own ass, they’d do exactly this: Drag their feet on doing any action, while verbally condemning the government breaking the law

  • Binturong@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Make it arrests and potentially executions for the egregious extremity of the nature of misuse of state power against citizens, and something might actually change. Nothing else resonates with this regime, clearly, why would they stop now?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      You can only issue arrest warrants for criminal contempt, meaning Trump can just issue a pardon. Civil contempt isn’t subject to the pardon power.

      And the people to issue the contempt judgements against aren’t Trump and team. They need to issue them to the foot soldiers. It sounds weak, but it’s effective.

      I work in in the development department of a very small municipality that’s an enclave for the mega-rich. Literally 100% of households are at least multi-millionaires. The average new house being built is about 8 million dollars. That means that when we Rey tonfine homeowners for illegal shit, it means nothing because they can just write a check if they don’t want to comply.

      So we’ve recently changed tactics on code enforcement. We start by telling them to stop and issuing a citation to the owners, but when they don’t we fine the individual workers on site and if things aren’tcleaned up we start to cite them each $500/day until they start to comply. It didn’t take long until the rich assholes couldn’t find workers willing to do their bidding.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          When you can’t take out the head, you sweep the legs.

          We can’t get Trump or his minions in Washington right now. But if we go after ICE and DHS people with massive civil fines, he’ll run out of people willing to do his bidding.

      • aaa999@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        hilarious that they pay the fine to get the thing but won’t pay someone else’s smaller fine to get the thing out of sheer moneybrain

      • lolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        So instead of something like proportional fines related to the value of the properties, you’ve fucked over the working class for violations that they didn’t commit, didn’t know about, and likely had no control over? Do you have any idea what an unexpected $500, $1000, or $1500 bill can do to a family that is struggling? Are these fines even legal? What types of violations by the rich are the working class being made to pay for? Do you also send warnings to the workers before taking their money, or do the owners get a warning and you just hope they tell everyone else? I find this little story completely abhorrent and I hope some of these workers sue your organization and get their money back.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The people we’re talking about have billions and we can only legally charge them a few thousand. We can’t cut off the money spigot, so we cut off the supply of workers willing to work for them.

          And the workers that get fined are the ones still performing the work after we’ve issued a verbal and written stop-work order and cited the owners. And it’s not like we just put something in the mail - we discover the work by driving by, seeing the workers on site, and speaking with them directly and telling them to stop. Our code enforcement people don’t cite the individual workers until their third trip to the site in which they’re told to stop. Hell - if they stopped when we first asked we wouldn’t even know who to cite if we wanted.

          Most of the time, they stop without being cited and work with us on permitting and remediation. We end up having to go after the contractors for violation of a SWO about 1% of the time (though we’ll also cite them for other things like wrenching through public utilities in the ROW more often). And in those cases it’s almost always the contractors who lie and either tell the owners a permit isn’t needed or that they already have one. The last time we did it they had actually printed out a forged permit placard.

          And that 1% that repeatedly refuses to follow the rules gets to go to court and explain their side to the judge, where the reality is they’ll probably have the daily fine dismissed and only pay the initial $500 or whatever if they start to cooperate.

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    The Trump admin are shaking in their boots at this FINAL NOTICE. They better watch their step or they might be getting a FINAL FINAL NOTICE next!