“Fcking bitch,” Jonathan Ross, the ICE agent who killed Renee Good, says in the video.*

A newly released cellphone video, apparently filmed by the ICE officer who killed Renee Nicole Good, and obtained by Minneapolis-based Alpha News, a conservative-leaning nonprofit news site, appears to sharply contradict the U.S. government’s public account of the fatal Wednesday shooting, raising new questions about whether the agent who opened fire was ever in immediate danger.

The footage was recorded on a cellphone by ICE officer Jonathan Ross, not by a department body camera. It captures Ross’s own perspective as he approaches Good’s maroon Honda Pilot during what the Department of Homeland Security claims was a federal operation in south Minneapolis.

  • pageflight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    7 days ago

    Her wife, Becca Good, stands nearby, recording as well.

    Her wife WATCHED HER GET MURDERED by Jonathan Ross? What a blood curdling nightmare.

    • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      7 days ago

      Could happen to anyone of us. If ICE agents don’t start taking bullets to the face soon, then that probability increases exponentially over the next few months.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 days ago

        Ice shooting people is already becoming more common. They’re escalating because there has been no consequences.

      • joostjakob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t think untrained violent people will respond less violently when the likelihood of violence against them increases. I would say y’all need to build barricades to safeguard neighborhoods, you need masses that can only be mowed down, and need to avoid being easily singled out. Using the car you are sitting in as a barricade is incredibly dangerous because there is a track record of using vehicles as weapons.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 days ago

      It just gets worse the more videos and angles you see.

      I hope Jonathan Ross’s family watches as the state executes him for premeditated murder.

  • fishos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 days ago

    Say the words. He called her a “Fucking bitch”. Stop fucking censoring language, especially over something like this. If the words offend you, GOOD. You should be fucking offended. (I know OP just reposted the articles censoring - this is directed at the article more than OP)

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Even if there was 4k 360° video of Renee being murdered by this scum the Trump administration would still side with the murderer.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 days ago

    In the video the cop conspicuously stops and pauses to look at the political stickers on the back of the vehicle before the shooting.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      I noticed that too. He clearly was documenting her for future harassment at the very least.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Wikang Tagalog
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    We don’t need MORE proof. Insinuating we need any more proof gives a veneer of validity to the suggestion there is any doubt at all. This is typical right wing “inundate with bullshit” that leaves anyone with a shred of hope of having an honest discussion constantly scrambling to offer more and more proof while the fact is that the Right DO NOT CARE. They’re here to “win”; honesty, morals, truth, reality be damned.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Yes, walking in front of, and behind a vehicle with it’s engine on SHOULD have made him feel danger. No one told him to walk in front of and behind a vehicle with the engine on, but if I’m wrong, and someone actually did tell him to do that, they’re the responsible party. If he made that decision on his own, it’s called contributory negligence.

  • orioler25@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is pointless. Even if she was aggressive and tried to kill this man, she’d be right to. This should not be able whether this Nazi felt in danger, they should feel threatened when they attack communities or random people. This video shows that peace is not an option with them. Consequences for chuds reduces their numbers significantly, they scatter when they realize they could actually get hurt.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well, I’m not sure him feeling danger is relevant. Who cares? He put himself into the danger he felt.

      • orioler25@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yes. That is what I said, except I don’t care if he even felt it. I’m saying they should feel threatened when they obviously do not.

  • jimjam5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    This would have been true sooner than this point in the regime but this event is the flashpoint, if I find out that any of my relatives or family members are ICE thugs I would dox them in a heartbeat.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    “There’s a new video?! Well then…let’s invade…oh…I don’t know…Bermuda!?”

  • neuromorph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    That video is tainted. No custody of evidence. The shooter had 48 hours to edit the video.

    Sync up the video /audio to thwle dozen others and see if things line up? How much time was removed from the phone?

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      If the video conveniently “proved” his claims of self defense, you’d have a point. But it clearly doesn’t. It shows he murdered her and his claims of self defense are a blatant lie. You’re literally arguing “well maybe it was self defense because the video could have been edited by the PERPETRATOR to not show it was self defense”. Like wtf?! You’re arguing that the dude purposely edited the video to make himself look worse.

      • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Pro-ICE voices (not necessarily people) think that the video supports the white house claims. The leaked site is right wing, and Vance shared it saying people should watch it.

        It’s crazy that this video seems to be such a Rorschach test.

        • phx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah I’m pretty sure their take on it is “her gay leftie lover made him feel threatened”

          Aka setting the "don’t worry, she wasn’t ‘one of us’ " distinction for the MAGAtts

      • neuromorph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Im not saying the video proves innocence. It can be manipulated and still not help the officer. The fact is ICe/magazine arent the smartest people and I would challenge that video on the basis of custody alone.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          And again, arguing custody would be arguing AGAINST the shooter. AT BEST, it would get the video thrown out and then we’d just look at the 4 other videos that all show the exact same thing. It literally doesn’t help, at all. It literally only would add a charge of tampering with evidence.