I hear people say things like “if Obama (or anyone left of Republicans) did what Trump did, there would be hell to pay.”

Why isn’t that argument taken more seriously by people on the left as an implicit admission that the left is politically weaker or less effective at wielding power?

If one side “can’t get away with” actions that the other can, doesn’t that suggest a real imbalance rather than moral superiority?

  • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    30 days ago

    When people say that, they aren’t implying the left are are morally superior. They’re implying the right has double standards. That the right is only interested in holding politicians on the left accountable, while giving politicians on the right free pass to do whatever.

    It’s obviously true, and it’s a problem for the left, but it’s a problem of the right.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    It’s seen as a problem for everyone.

    If someone wins a sports tournament, and we later discover they had cheated, we don’t ask the other competitors why they weren’t smart enough or strong enough to cheat.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      30 days ago

      I don’t think people who aren’t cheating get to compete at that level so they wouldn’t get the chance to ask. They don’t get the opportunity

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        This tells me that you are assuming everyone is cheating, and thus cheating is not only excusable, but necessary.

        I disagree. Most people are not cheaters, and more cheating does not create fairness, just more assholes.

        • ChexMax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          30 days ago

          Most people are not cheaters. They’re saying most or all politicians on the national level are cheaters. Seems like everyone but Bernie and AOC. idk how cheater-y Romney was.

          I think carter was actually honest. That’s why the right hates him so much.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            Carter was a a good person and put forth good policies.

            That’s why he’s seen as weak by everyone including democrats/left. Good policy and good actions make everyone feel bad about themselves. Carter also asked Americans to make sacrifices and inconveneince themselves for the greater good… which is a huge political no no. Americans love convenience above all else and gladly sacrifice their children’s happiness for lower taxes and cheaper gas.

            Part of what makes Trump so popular is his unhinged assholery makes people feel good because he gives them permission to embrace their shittier selves.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    29 days ago

    So like you want President Gavin Newsom to order the Justice department to charge Tucker Carlson with mortgage fraud?

    Corruption and abuse of power actually get worse if it’s “both sides”. Don’t you think?

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    the left as an implicit admission that the left is politically weaker

    That’s not my conclusion from all this. Presidents like Biden and Obama cared about the law somewhat and tried to play by the book, which only seems like their hands were tied when they weren’t. The same goes for other politicians who do get away with a lot of shit. The difference is that Trump likes to make a spectacle out of it.

  • mrdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    Americans presidents an get away from everything no matter which party they represent

  • czardestructo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Different standards and playbooks because the democrats pander to largely educated voters who want facts and the illusion of accountability where as republicans pander to uneducated reactionary tribalism and any educated folk who allow themselves to be swept up in it. Some folks just need to be told what to think, others need to be convinced. You can call that imbalance if you like.

  • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    30 days ago

    yes, but the left is more interested in infighting and sabotaging itself than building any political unity or coherence like Trump has done with the republicans. They don’t care they are a ‘joke’ because they mostly care that their seats are secure. Imcumbancy is the major issue why Democrats have become so weak, and anyone with new ideas or any political drive is often seen as a threat to the ‘keep my job at all costs’ who make up the majority of democrats.

    Democrats used to do things, but that was in the 1980s and 1990s. Remember Bill Clinton, even had a republican house and managed to get shit done. No?

  • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    30 days ago

    It’s a performative statement, neither Democrats nor Republicans will even be held accountable for their actions by their peers. The oligarchy will never charge one of their own