The Department of War (DOW) is receiving well-earned praise for reversing the military’s recruitment crisis. In FY2025, all the branches of the military met or exceeded their recruitment goals.

(The problem) is America’s retention crisis. Given the immensely complex tasks we demand of experienced enlisted service members and officers, the time and money it takes to replace the expertise required to perform these tasks, and how central this expertise is to modern warfighting, we cannot afford to keep hemorrhaging essential talent.

Despite spending nearly six billion dollars on recruiting and retention in recent years, including giving over 70,000 people retention bonuses, people are leaving the military at some of the highest rates of the last decade. For instance, 7% of Air Force officers and 11% of Airmen now leave the service each year, 350% and 550% above the national average, respectively.

Unsurprisingly, the more specialized and in-demand an officer’s skill-set is, the more likely the military is to lose them to the private sector. Four thousand troops left cyber jobs in 2024, despite DOW facing a 16% cyber position vacancy rate. While DOW does not publicly track how many AI experts it employs and loses each year, Georgetown University reports an intense shortage of uniformed personnel who understand both the mission and the emerging technology.

  • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    4 months ago

    Idk, now that we’re planning invasions on our home soil maybe some people look at it differently now.

    Plus, it’s department of defense.

    • Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is true having talked to a few enlisted they are wary of re-enlisting when their contract is up. Anecdotal I guess but at least some people really don’t like where things are going.

    • limonfiesta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Apparently it’s unpopular to call it the DoW, and while I realize that Congress has yet to officially change it, I think it’s a much more appropriate, and accurate, name.

      When was the last time the DoD was engaged in a defensive war?

      So unless they plan on further changing it to the Department of War Crimes, I think DoW is as good as we can hope for a name that aligns with their actual purpose.

      • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        4 months ago

        The U.S. Department of Defense is now also referred to as the Department of War, following an executive order signed by President Trump in September 2025. However, the official statutory name remains the Department of Defense until Congress makes a formal change.

        • chunes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s not a bootlicker take to want to call a spade a spade. Quite the opposite, I would think

      • mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I understand the point you’re making but refuse to give them the satisfaction.

        Also let’s be real, there’s a distinct possibility it was changed because these dumbfucks can’t spell ‘defense’

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          idk, to me it seems like one of the few honest acts this administration has done. it’s always been the department of war, they just took the mask off

  • Prox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    Unsurprisingly, the more specialized and in-demand an officer’s skill-set is, the more likely the military is to lose them to the private sector. Four thousand troops left cyber jobs in 2024, despite DOW facing a 16% cyber position vacancy rate.

    Yup. DoD pay sucks, and private sector benefits have pretty much caught up. I know people who left government positions for raises of 15%-33%. Government used to be able to pay less but still keep people due to the promise of stability, but those days are long gone.

    • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not in a tech field just a helicopter mechanic. I now work on the exact same helicopters I did in the Marines (I mean the same BUNOs), in the exact same hangar spaces, using some of the exact same tools… but now I’ve got better pay, my day ends after 8 hours (otherwise OT), I know I’m getting the weekend off (otherwise OT), all that stuff is even better since I’m union. Being the steward it’s easier to tell my boss to fuck off on some things (Though, while I was in it was more forgivable to physically fight my bosses and coworkers), and I still get socialized medicine via the VA. Plus, my socialized & guaranteed basic income via VA disability. Many of my coworkers are going to school after work thanks to socialized education benefits via the VA.

      It’s much more lucrative to take military OJT into the 1st Civ Div than to stay in. Plus, I get to spend time convincing my coworkers (99% former military) they’re already socialist. It’s heartwarming how many are not happy with our government.

      In the United States 4 years in the military is the cheat code to a better life. Unfortunately.

    • patrlim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s almost like people join the country to defend it, not to go to war… They should have a department for that!

        • EightLeggedFreak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Obviously from all those plucky little 3rd world countries we democratized in previous wars, silly! In other words, we’re just defending ourselves from the consequences of our actions; totally normal and rational and okay to call it defense.

          In case I’m not clear: the US has been the hotdog costume guy for a long time, but we don’t drive a car into the shops we’re robbing, we bring tanks.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Theoretical defense, war is an institution and if not maintained you may be caught wrong footed when it comes a knocking. How many empires, kingdoms, or city states have been utterly annihilated because they forgot how to truly conduct warfare.

        • evenglow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          To defend rich people’s interests. In a capitalist country that is usually fossil fuels and ocean shipping lanes.

          Need to be able to ship in oil from the middle east and everything else from China.

          Poor people have to worry about cops. Rich people have worry about their revenue streams. The military and cops protect those “interests”.

          Remember kids, politicians use the military when those politicians failed at their job but refuse to step down. The military is a weapon not a tool.

  • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    A sped up license reciprocity system sounds great and may help with military family unemployment but it isn’t going to make a six figure private sector tech job disappear. People use the military to get education and training. Once they have it they leave. Especially if the grass is greener on the other side.

  • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Retirement is 20 years after signing up. 20 years ago was 2025; there was such an enormous push for recruitment then. Expect this trend to continue well into 2028 when the surge ended.

    Edit: LOL I really should proof read comments. Obviously I meant 2005…

    • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Recruiting crayon munchers is not competence or capability. They just happen to fall for the propaganda the easiest because they are dumb as rocks.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Only branch to pass financial audits. So competent, and obviously mission capable. I know folks like to do the whole crayons thing, but it just demonstrates an obvious lack of understanding.