Apparently it’s unpopular to call it the DoW, and while I realize that Congress has yet to officially change it, I think it’s a much more appropriate, and accurate, name.
When was the last time the DoD was engaged in a defensive war?
So unless they plan on further changing it to the Department of War Crimes, I think DoW is as good as we can hope for a name that aligns with their actual purpose.
It was used exclusively by his viewers who had formed parasocial relationships.
Literally, no one else.
Nothing else hits like a good old-fashioned European museum jewelry heist.
He literally makes an analogous comparison in the first sentence to cigarettes and social media.
So I say again, why were you ignoring the obvious comparisons that I was referencing with my reply?
And for the record, I completely disagree with your apples vs oranges dismissal.
They are not apples and oranges, as both cigarettes and social media use are directly linked to statistically significant poor health outcomes in people who use them.
But, if you really have a problem with that comparison, you should have replied to the person who introduced that lengthy line of conversation and not just people quickly responding to it.
Why are you ignoring the comment that I was responding to?
It’s not me who made the comparison.
Social media is way worse, and it’s not even close.
I couldn’t finish reading the article, the kids sounds like a complete psychopath.
No child deserves life in prison, but that is not someone you want walking the streets.
So anyone who doesn’t agree with what you’re saying is virtue signaling, and anyone not behaving in accordance to your proclamations, is a fascist?
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha
Probably a sign of a guilty conscience.
Another win for New Labour.
Keep it up boys!
I’d prefer AI cores, just like I prefer HW based AES instructions: present and up to my discretion as to how I choose to use them, or not.
That’s an incredibly myopic take that confuses correlation with causation.
These moves may benefit Putin, but Russia isn’t the only county to benefit. Infact, Russia is in a historically weak position to fill gaps left by a receding American empire.
I’d wager that China is likely to see much more geopolitical gains because they have the resources and capacity to take advantage of the situation.
I’m not saying Putin won’t benefit, just pointing out how limiting it is to view Trump through a singular lens.
I don’t understand the naysayers here.
This is hilarious. Trump wants to simultaneously expand the American empire, while he dismantles the tools of it that he’s too stupid to understand the importance of.
No matter their mission statement, or any tangible benefits they might have provided, both USAID and VOA, were tools of empire. These aren’t mutually exclusive concepts.
How dare you. It’s post inauguration, which means we’re already a few days into rewriting Biden’s legacy.
Please revise your comment accordingly.
Trump is not a regulator, or even a bureaucrat.
Russia does not have hegemony over Europe.
That’s not hegemony.
I’m blown away that three people read that and thought it deserved an up vote:
Russian regulatory capture in the US
Russian hegemony over Europe
Seriously?
South Korea has had military dictatorships off and on it’s entire history
Declaring martial law under those conditions, is significantly different than January 6th.
I can’t tell if New Labour is as bad as the Democrats yet, but boy do they also seem determined to serve the interests of the Epstein class, at the direct and immediate expense of everyone else.