• Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ea Nasir is a really interesting case study of how one piece of information can be interpreted in two completely different ways.

      One interpretation, and the one most people know, is that the authors of the clay tablets complaints are legitimate.

      The other is that Ea Nasir kept them as a record of people attempting to harm his reputation. So he could remember who to avoid doing business with in the future.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Also ancient Sumer had a pretty decent legal system for it’s time, it’s entirely possible Ea-Nasir was keeping the tablets for a possible court case. So the ancient equivalent of saving texts from a shit customer.

  • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Gonna be downvoted, because apparently this is car brain central, but the amount of mental gymnastics people will do to make red light camera enforcement “bad” is crazy.

    The US’ private company control over these cameras notwithstanding.

    Fuck me, so many people die on on roads, and especially at intersections.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      The city I work for put up Flock cameras with specific instructions from Council that they were only to be used for identification of cars flagged in active warrants.

      Within a week of their installation, police used the cameras to track the movements of someone who filed a complaint.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sounds like a police/privacy problem, not the idea of having cameras at all.

        Police should need a warrant to access the videos.

        The software should not log licence plates of every single car that comes past.

        The software should be open source and developed by the public sector.

        I agree what’s in place in the US is a privacy nightmare, but the idea of having cameras in general isn’t fundamentally bad.

        Skill issue USA, git gud.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The US’ private companies

      this is entirely the problem, because they’re turning over info to ICE and other agencies and it’s being used oppressively.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Hence my carve out. I don’t support the privacy nightmare the US has.

        I do support road safety cameras in general, if managed properly.

        People don’t have the right to have no consequences for their dangerous behaviour.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I do support road safety cameras in general, if managed properly.

          yeah that’s the rub. what municipality do you trust to manage them properly in this day and age? I’ve seen horror stories from all over the US, UK…

          I fucking hate, absolutely despise the vroom vroom dickheads who make these technologies desirable. I want them to be held accountable but am not sure it’s worth the ice goons and yokel yokels who will abuse their capabilities.

    • yourgodlucifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I just don’t think having this kind of surveillance state apparatus is ever worth it I don’t want the government or private companies tracking my every move.

      I don’t even own a car and I want these cameras gone.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t want the government or private companies tracking my every move

        This is an issue with how the cameras are operated. I’m taking issue with people complaining that these cameras exist at all.

        People claiming no system could ever be privacy-preserving aren’t being very imaginative.

        I agree the surveillance state is bad, but taking a picture of someone running a red light and sending them a fine is a good thing, sorry.

        What’s bad is allowing cameras to passively record every single licence plate at all times and store that information. A speed or red light camera should only take a photo/video when it detects someone speeding/running a red light, and no other information should be stored.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I can condone taking down pedestrian surveillance, but people who drive cars should follow the rules or get fucked.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Photo enforcement cameras are problematic for several reasons.

      A) It has been shown that yellow lights with such cameras are very often set to a yellow duration briefer than generally accepted engineering practices to increase revenue *1

      B) They discourage a rare misbehavior, actually running red lights, whilst causing another to become common. That is slamming on the brakes even when it isn’t safe to stop. Exacerbated by A. Better slam on the brakes when it flicks yellow even if you are way too close to reasonably stop whilst going only the speed limit.

      People who are caught up by it are almost always those who found themselves a bit too far into the intersection to safely stop. EG those who cross the threshold right as it is changing. There is for reasons of safety a few seconds between one light turning red and another green. At 30 mph (44 feet per second) someone will fully clear a 40 foot intersection in less than a second. That is to say the only people you catch aren’t those who would have collided.

      They are those

      1. you fucked with the shorter duration yellow oops
      2. people who hesitated because of 1 and slowed but ultimately decided to proceed thinking they can make it
      3. People with poorer brakes and or dealing with rainy conditions reducing stopping time.

      C) Most of the money goes to the contractor who owns the cameras. Essentially you are letting a private company prey on your citizens as long as government gets to keep the scraps.

      *1 https://ww2.motorists.org/blog/6-cities-that-were-caught-shortening-yellow-light-times-for-profit/

      • pahlimur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ll add one more. They subvert our right to a trial and seeing our accuser. The fines are all supposed to be viewed by some sort of officer that is supposed to show up if you challenge the ticket. The only one I’ve received didn’t have any info on how to challenge it. It was like a bill that obfuscated my right to a trial. Guilt is assumed and forgiveness is ignored. 28 in a school zone in an unfamiliar city, instant fine with no “oops I fucked up” recourse.

    • paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If only it were possible to transport humans and goods without a network of cameras invading everyone’s privacy.

      If only that was the natural state of the world for more of human history until just a few years ago.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        red light ones are not great due to increased rear endings from some idiot slamming the brakes on when they should have gone through / people rushing and assuming the person in front will go through the yellow.

        speed ones work great, when placed appropriately (i.e. on a street with an appropriate speed limit for the road design and in areas of higher pedestrian activity). I hate that Ontario just banned speed enforcement cameras, because that means a loss of revenue to pay for the road network maintenance, more police activity enforcing speed (which a camera does automatically all day long) which means police aren’t doing more important stuff and also it’s a waste of my tax dollars, and they will have to spend more of my tax dollars putting shittier speed reduction methods in place like speed bumps (annoying as fuck, bad for fuel economy, loud because people race from speed bump to speed bump, ineffective because people pay attention racing from speed bump to speed bump instead of to what’s going on around them, annoying for bicycles and people with towing trailers, loud when people telling trailers go over them, loud when regular cars go over them, bad for snow plows…)

        now, this is just for speed enforcement, not coordinating traffic flow. although in a properly designed network, there are times that this can actually be achieved, unlike those light cycles on arterial roads that let you go through if you speed just a little bit but if you go the speed limit you hit every single red light

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          There are plenty of areas where the speed that is safe and reasonable to travel is substantially different from the one set. This is only not wildly broken because everyone disobeys the law and the cops refrain from stringent enforcement because forcing the traffic to all slow down would completely break traffic flow.

          Maybe this works well in Canada but America governments are about as stupid as Americans.

    • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      You think people pushing that thought further than “What’s the edgiest political personality I can use for posing online”

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Government surveillance tracking device you mean? Enrich the local cops devices? Over half of violations monies collected goes to the corporations that market them to local and state officials with lavish dinners and vacations devices? Financial incentive to calibrate them to flag innocent drivers knowing there is little to no recourse against the company devices? 5.5 lbs you say?

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The USA needs more speed traps (all sorts), red light cameras, traffic circles and draconian fines to prevent the undisciplined idiots from killing people.

  • dan69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    only reason you shouldn’t is have accountability for maybe not you, but for the bad drivers.

  • Eh-I@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just don’t think there’s that much copper in a camera. That’s a lot of weight for a camera by itself.