• Joeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    They are trying to cause riots… because they want to inact martial law… this is the whole plan… best thing to do is keep being peaceful because they don’t understand why people aren’t being violent, because thats exactly what they would be doing…

    Matter of fact its what they did on Jan 6…

    • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They are trying to cause riots

      This is my exact read on the matter. We can’t be the only ones to see it this way. What surprises me is that more analysts and pundits aren’t talking about the economic violence from this angle. And when the masses finally reach their threshold, the Conservatives will do their “Whaaaat? So much for the tolerant Left.”

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes being peaceful well fight the “evil” why didn’t we think of that during the world wars.

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      best thing to do is keep being peaceful

      This is a typical abusee mindset.

      “I know they’re abusive but if I don’t do anything to anger them they’ll leave me alone”

      They won’t. The problem is them, not you.

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Peaceful protest is what is meant, instead of violent protest. Peaceful doesn’t mean doing nothing.

      • Joeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Is it though? So you think that people should start rioting so they will enact martial law…

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Vs doing nothing and getting martial law anyway.

  • Geodad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The cruelty is the point.

    Trump is trying to hold the poorest people hostage to get Democrats to cave.

    I hope to see video clips of Trump clutching his chest in agonizing pain and collapsing.

    • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I hope it happens on live TV during one of his ramblings, or that he devolves even farther as another stroke hits him before collapsing and hopefully breaking something on the way down.

      I don’t like what monsters like him have made me wish for, but that won’t stop me from celebrating when they are gone. I’m tired of “turn the other cheek” and “meet in the middle” complacency and I have been for a while.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Republicans can pass their stupid budget without democrats. All they have to do is give up the rule that allows minority power in the senate. They could even try making schumer actually do a fillibuster where he has to stand up and talk for days on end.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Oh I know, give them Rebates! Corpo scum loves to push rebates on people because many will forget to use them. So give em a taste of the ole rebate loophole. 10% instant rebate for SNAP card holders.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    So what law are these stores violating? How are they going to detect and enforce that, if there is in fact a law that exists that actually says this (and again, I don’t believe there is)?

    Edit: yeah should have read the article, the answer is in there

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      At issue is SNAP’s “Equal Treatment Rule,” which bars stores from either discriminating against people in the program or offering them favorable treatment.

      It’s in the article. I’ll leave the googling of the equal Treatment Rule up to you.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Fair point. I did not read the article before responding, so that is on me.

        At the same time, if people are in the program, but are not getting the benefits of the program… are they in the program?