• T00l_shed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 months ago

    Of course, the dems always need to reach across the aisle, but it doesn’t apply to the gop lol

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can’t help but feel like this would already be over if Democrats were better at messaging. The Republicans are so obviously on the wrong side of this, but every time Schumer opens his mouth poll numbers come out instead of rising insurance premiums.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      Media isn’t owned by people sympathetic to Democratic talking points.

      Doesn’t matter what your message is if no one plays it.

        • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Well, the democrats do use the democratic talking points whether the politicians actually believe in them or are more beholden to their rich donors. But the real problem is the media who spin everything against the democrats. As a result, people (like you) are subconsciously programmed to hate on the democrats regardless of what they say.

          • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            But the real problem is the media who spin everything against the democrats.

            Citation needed on that one. The media is owned by the same people who own the politicians.

            As a result, people (like you) are subconsciously programmed to hate on the democrats regardless of what they say.

            No the problem is that Democrats are all talk and no action and people like yourself are subconsciously programmed to always invent or repeat excuses for why that is. You think that Democrats are the good guys just by virtue of Republicans being the bad guys. Unfortunately, we don’t live in a Marvel movie with clearly defined heroes and villains battling it out. In the real world, they can all be villians. Some just dress their villainy in flowery language.

            • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              I didn’t say they were the good guys. They are better. And that is the salient fact when it’s a two party system. They are beholden to the billionaires but they pull more to the left than the gop. It is because they’re financed by the billionaires that they can’t go too progressive or else they lose their funding (and ability to get elected). And they’re not pedo supporting, full on fascist and bat shit crazy which is also a good thing. But idiots who fall for the right wing propaganda see them as as bad or worse than the gop. Those who get confused and become too unmotivated / lazy to vote are just as bad. You can certainly argue the democrats aren’t progressive enough, and I totally agree with that; but they are monumentally better than the gop right now. Not voting for the dems is cutting off your nose to spite your face; it’s stupid. That we have a Republican government is purely because too many Americans are idiots and fall for the right wing media.

              • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                They are better. And that is the salient fact when it’s a two party system.

                Which is just a roundabout way of saying they’re the good guys and regardless of how heinous they become they’ll still be the good guys to you because the Republicans will always be worse. They never need to actually accomplish anything because they’ve permanently earned your vote by simply not having an R next to their name. You’ll ensure they stay in power despite actively working against you because they aren’t the GOP. See where this logic falls apart?

                That we have a Republican government is purely because too many Americans are idiots and fall for the right wing media.

                That we have a Republican government is because the Democrats feel entitled to your vote and are unwilling to actually fight for anything but themselves. They have people like yourself who will blame literally everyone but them for their own poor performance. It turns out “vote for us because we’re not Republican” doesn’t resonate with voters as much these days. They’ve had numerous opportunities to actually earn votes by fighting for us, but they feel they don’t need to adapt or improve themselves because being “less evil” should be good enough for the American public, right? Being diet-Republican is good enough.

                You’ll spend your energy fighting for people who you admit are bought and paid for, that you admit won’t defy their rich masters, that you admit “aren’t good,” but refuse to alter your behavior in any way while complaining about how bad things are. You’ll spend your energy arguing that we need to keep things bad or they might get worse (as they continue to get worse) while completely refusing to let others argue for a better way. This is why the country is the way it is. There’s very little difference between you and the Republican base doing the exact same thing for their chosen candidate. You’re all just engaging in diehard team sports despite both teams being absolute garbage and you want to keep it that way.

                • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’m not arguing for the sake of the democrat politicians, but for the sake of the country. It’s not a matter of supporting a team, but choosing which politician of the viable options is better. ‘Team’ support is when you vote against your own interest because of a historical affiliation. Dems are better so voting for them is logical. I understand you feel the democrats aren’t good enough and you think if they don’t get enough votes, they’ll change to be more progressive, but unfortunately that’s not likely to work. Furthermore it gets us trump and other rightwing assholes in power for another four years - and that’s really bad. It’s on you if you don’t vote for the better option.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I do think republican donors owning all the major media leads people to only see the worst messagers in the party as they censor the better ones’

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I honestly don’t understand how

    1. Americans are this god damn stupid to realize Republicans are literally saying “fuck you, we won’t back down from you dying in the streets.”

    2. How bad the Democrats are that they’re failing to capitalize on that message.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, you see, Republicans are such a terrible party that they make Democrats look like they’re worth voting for.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      because republicans and establishment-dems are still on the same side, that of Big Business (and AIPAC).

      these establishment politicians still believe things can “return to normal” (read, unsustainable ratfucking) after trump croaks, which…won’t happen, but as long as they still think it’s possibility they’ll why get in the way of the money printer?

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because that is historically what they have done. Republicans know that can take advantage of Democrats “weakness” of being able to compromise. The illegal firing of furloughed workers is metaphorically the Republican terrorists executing hostages until their demands are met. They don’t care about the damage they are doing, but they know their opponents do. They have also historically used the tactic successfully.

      They expect it has worked in the past. They will keep executing their hostages and they will keep blaming their own willful destruction on those who won’t just give them everything they want. What they are too stupid to realize is that many of their hostages are their own people, and the only thing that makes a rightist reconsider their sick ideology is when it comes back to bite them personally.

    • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because party Democrats are fucking cowards who fold the moment they face a moment of resistance. If I were the Republican party, I would have considered it to be a safe gambit.

      It’s good that the Democrats are refusing to give in now, but they really could have started doing that up to a year ago.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      He thinks they can force their hand by saying it’s the Democrats that are preventing the military from getting paid.

      So, basically, if Mike Johnson was your dad and (after he spent all day tracking your internet habits) you were abducted, you’d be a goner and he would go around blaming the abductors for refusing to release you for free.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ok.

    Don’t.

    Your party is in control. Don’t negotiate and watch what happens to your head when enough Americans get real desperate.

    Even poor people can build guillotines.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    As a Canadian who has almost limitless free access to healthcare, I’ve never understood America’s decision to withhold the same from millions of people.

    Instead the US spends $1 trillion on war machines.

    Make it make sense.

    • blattrules@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t make any sense, it’s so fucking stupid. I can’t stand paying a middleman every month who is not a doctor and can just deny me coverage that I need if I go to the wrong hospital or if they don’t agree with something my doctor recommended. All because a significant portion of the populace is too fucking stupid to understand how this is an extremely inefficient system at best and they reduce any argument in favor of changing it to “communism!” which is a word they heard is bad generations ago and never bothered spending two seconds to look up the actual definition ever since.

        • blattrules@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, it’s not like we don’t have them too; if I want to make an appointment to see my primary care physician, it’s about a month out; cardiologist is about a month and a half. I’m failing to see the downside to socialized medicine that makes it so much worse than our current system.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It doesn’t make any sense

        a significant portion of the populace is too fucking stupid to understand

        You just answered your own question. Welcome to America. It isn’t getting smarter anytime soon.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because the American theocracy is built around their most holy of books, “Atlas Shrugged.” Greed and selfishness are noble pursuits, and whoever is hurt by them deserves it because they weren’t strong enough to fight back and win.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, yes but also extremely no. Rand’s influence ends about three feet away from those books. The Chicago School of Economics, The Cato Institute, and The Heritage Foundation are the real powerhouses here.

        That, plus good ol’ racism and the oil crisis of the 70s are why we missed the bus on robust social safety nets. (Boomers were making actual societal change, but then the oil crisis turned a majority of them into conservatives)

        • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The oil crisis will go down in history as the beginning of the end, where the story of the Late American Republic starts.

          All that is left to decide is what chapter follows

    • skozzii@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It doesn’t make sense but as long as they are given another person to look down on the Americans seem happy.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Make it make sense.

      Propaganda + Human Stupidity

      We aren’t as evolved as people would like to think.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      it’s worse than that, we spend more federal $ on our non-existent healthcare than than spend on the war machine.

      our entire federal government has served to line the pockets of big business for many decades at this point

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Keep it closed. The government hasbeen crumbling for 40 years now. The parts that actually helped Americans want fair nor transformative in a grand scheme, by design. America just isn’t hungry enough for change. Keep it closed. Every Nation is just three missed meals away from revolution, and considering the largest employer isn’t paying it’s workers it’ll be about another 60 days before we’re hungry enough.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup.

      We’re in an abusive relationship with our federal government. Keep it shut down until Americans revolt and deal with the fascists. Then we can reorganize it and try again.

  • Burninator05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    he “won’t negotiate” with Democrats until they hit pause on their health care demands

    FIFH: I won’t negotiate until you stop trying to negotiate.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Translation: Mike Johnson doesn’t care if you have healthcare or not, Americans. And he’s willing to deprive millions of their paychecks to prove it.

    • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Let him try. The soldiers know who’s withholding their pay, and you never not pay your soldiers. Should honestly be rule 1 of history, even before don’t print money to pay for debt and don’t invade Russia in winter

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not a negotiation. It’s a stark choice to follow darkness instead of light.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    He won’t negotiate until the other side gives up all their leverage, despite a history of them not negotiating and just demanding things.

    Yup, sounds right.