• Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    2·
    11 hours ago

    It feels to me that at some point, we will just need to do away with all categories. At what point does it stop being useful to keep putting labels on points on a possibly infinite spectrum?

    Would it be better to just push for acceptance in all forms? Forget the labels and just be yourself and accept others for who they are? (Barring, of course, people who are evil or criminal, etc)

    My personal experience has been one of:i am unsure of my sexuality and unsure of my gender. Eventually, i decided that I wouldn’t focus on what gender or sexuality i am since i dont fit into the main categories. i will just be my own category and enjoy my life the way i want to live it.

    I know who i am, and i know what i am. I dont need a label to feel secure about that.

    Man was enough, and straight was enough to make things easier for me and others. even though i am not quite man and not quite straight. I fit nicely into neither category, but both are close enough that i am content to just say that rather than have to explain myself to everyone i meet.

    Anyone who knows me or gets to know me will know who and what i am eventually.

    • morphballganon@mtgzone.comEnglish
      1·
      5 hours ago

      People use labels to get information quickly as a form of vetting.

      “You’re not… a republican, are you?”

      “Oh, hell no!”

      “Oh good!”

      Now they can let their guard down and be friends. Without labels, determining they are talking to a decent person takes much longer.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      1·
      9 hours ago

      You make some good points, and even though the labels man and straight work for me, I have likewise been focusing more and more on the whole “know thyself and live life the way that really works for you” thing and loving it.

      But back to my quip: You make some good points. I can foresee how much my dumb angry conservative relatives would hate it! No labels? No categories? Next you’re going to tell me that humans don’t naturally need strict hierarchy in their society to survive!

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    31·
    13 hours ago

    Really digging deep into the tickle trunk to find something to hate straight people for…

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    135·
    2 days ago

    “The terms pansexual, omnisexual, fluid and queer-identified are regarded as falling under the umbrella term bisexual (and therefore are considered a part of the bisexual community). Some use LGBT+ to mean “LGBT and related communities”.[29] Other variants may have a “U” for “unsure”; a “C” for “curious”; another “T” for “transvestite”; a “TS”, “2S”, or “2” for “two-spirit” persons; or an “SA” for “straight allies”.[48][49][50][51][52] The inclusion of straight allies in the LGBT initialism has proven controversial, as many straight allies have been accused of using LGBT advocacy to gain popularity and status in recent years,[53] and various LGBT activists have criticised the heteronormative worldview of certain straight allies.[54] Some may also add a “P” for “polyamorous” or “pangender”, an “H” for “HIV-affected”, or an “O” for “other”.[14][55] The initialism LGBTIH has seen use in India to encompass the hijra third gender identity and the related subculture.[56][57]”

    Only Anglo-Saxons can make not being straight an overly structured and semantically confusing endeavour, lol. 🤷

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    3·
    2 days ago

    I actually love when a new overspelled name comes out. It gives me more fuel for when I screw up peoples names from the short form. Jessleigh, Jessifer, Jessbinder, Jessolomew, etc.

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    1·
    2 days ago

    Breh, what kid? I just discovered some people make half my rent and live a more meaningfull life.

    Btw we live in small appartment, not some luxurious private island you’d expect for that kind of money.

    Fuck this economy xD