• foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why did they use a pipe instead of the letter I?

    | Don’t like it.

      • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah one of the fist ways I learned to create engagement was to fake typos / make simple grammer mistakes.

    • bus_factor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not meant to be an I, it’s meant to be an action. They’re not writing “I commanded an army”, they’re writing “commanded an army”.

      No, it was not a good choice. But that’s what they were probably doing.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Honestly, my brain just didn’t even process it as an I. I just looked over it and started the sentences without them.

      Anyway, why the fuck did they do that?

  • Oscar Cunningham@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    6 months ago

    Stable and prosperous? She started with a civil war and ended by being conquered by Rome. The bit in the middle wasn’t stable either.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      3 Antony, on the contrary, like Heracles in paintings where Omphalé is seen taking away his club and stripping off his lion’s skin, was often disarmed by Cleopatra, subdued by her spells, 957and persuaded to  p339 drop from his hands great undertakings and necessary campaigns, only to roam about and play with her on the sea-shores by Canopus and Taphosiris. 4 And at last, like Paris, he ran away from the battle and sank upon her bosom; although, more truly stated, Paris ran away to Helen’s chamber after he had been defeated; but Antony ran away in chase of Cleopatra, and thereby threw away the victory.

      Plutarch was a bit of both, but that tendency has definitely existed longer than movies.

  • breecher@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nah, it is the other way around. Historians would say those facts, and Hollywood and possibly general media would be the ones saying “sexy”.

  • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    Don’t historians say she probably wasn’t sexy? Just super bold which attracted powerful men, who hasn’t seen much of that back then.

    • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      She was a powerful personality. All the records indicate that she was of seemingly above average beauty standards, but nothing earth shattering.

      Instead, it is claimed that her strength of personality is what attracted the powerful men in her life to her.

    • HowAbt2day@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      She had access to creams, ointments and fragrances and good sleep. She also kept ugly ass lady servants to keep the contrast in her favor.

    • breecher@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yeah, it is the exact opposite of what OP claims. Historians are basically the only ones constantly demystifying her, while her legend as a sexy femme fatale lives on in the general public mind (thanks pretty much exclusively to Hollywood, because let’s face it, noone would know she existed without them).

  • MusicSoulEdu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I do find it hilarious that we associate sexiness with Cleopatra because of an intensive smear campaign.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      She probably was legitimately attractive by Roman cultural norms and almost certainly leveraged that when dealing with Rome. The smear campaign was more playing that aspect up while downplaying the fact she was a genuine once-in-a-generation genius than making up things about how sexy she was.