• andybytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder if this is gonna be like Waymo, where statistically speaking, the amount of cars that they had on the road, with how many crashes they had, it was deemed ineffective and dangerous, but as soon as they reduced the cars on the road they had less incidents because less odds. At this point, they probably continue to suck up subsidies and donar $ so they keep their little goofy business afloat. So what happens now? When It crashes into a school bus, who is held accountable? This is not a good idea. We need to tax the rich and corporations shouldn’t have so much power. We didn’t ask for this future. Anybody with a damn lick of sense knows that this is a stupid idea. Also, why? Like, just make more trains. America is so stupid. The fact that you just fight over cars versus walkable cities. I am actively trying to find a way out of here. These are horrific insanely stupid ideas. It’s like doing it the hard way because you’re too prideful to admit that you have a shitty infrastructure.I have seen Europe, I have experienced it, and it is far superior to the shitty infrastructure of the United States. I was born in America. I lived in America, but I do not identify with this way of life or culture. My head spins with just where people’s minds are at in this country. How little they know. It’s terrifying. If you’re out there, just know. It is better elsewhere and chase those goals. You’re not crazy. There’s a better world. Not perfect, but a better world out there. Leave if you want to leave, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

  • twopi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why not make automated trains with their own dedicated right of way?

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 days ago

    As of Thursday, the company’s self-driving tech has completed over 1,200 miles without a human in the truck.

    That’s not an impressive number. That’s like 2 days’ worth of driving.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s 5 one way trips. The article says the trucks run from Dallas to Houston which is about 250 miles according to google. It does mention that over 4 years it’s made 10,000 deliveries but I wasn’t sure if that meant as a company or with the self driving trucks but had a driver in the truck for the 10,000 deliveries. It only specifies that the 1,200 miles has been done without a person in the truck.

    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Its enough to prove the concept.

      If it saves 1% of operating costs trucking businesses will be falling over themselves to implement it.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’d actually bet they’re safer than some tweaked out dude on his 20th hour at the wheel.

    • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I vaguely remember a dystopian book that described that exact thing as the protagonist thinking he was looking at an odd flag on the front of the truck until he realized what it was. Can’t remember what the book was though 😔

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    And how do they handle a person slowing down in front of them and hijacking them? At least a human might be able to navigate away aggressively but I think the programming would prevent as much harm as possible.

    This new lawless future and we may need to raid corpo lords.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I can’t really imagine people wanting to hijack a truck that’s basically a giant camera and tracking system.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I dunno I can see it being done, go in first with a drone and blind the cameras one by one (not hard to rig it up with spray paint) then grab the goods, pick an isolated section of the route so you’re gone by the time anyone comes looking.

        I for one predict a glorious era of road pirates.

        • saltesc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          If they unloaded the goods to another truck really fucking fast, maybe. Otherwise they’re just being recorded on top of a giant GPS beacon that’s alerting a system that something abnormal is happening so rally nearby law enforcement. It’d way easier to hold up a bookies, with a shotgun, Saul.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I think the programming would prevent as much harm as possible.

      well, yeah… why wouldn’t you want a human to do the same thing??? you’re watching too many fast and furious movies.

      Firstly, no one in an 18 wheeler loaded with cargo is “navigating away” from anyone desperate enough to attempt such a scheme. This entire idea is ludicrous, think about how slow and massive those trucks are.

      Secondly, you don’t want an 18 wheeler loaded with cargo being driven aggressively. You’re just escalating the risk of killing yourself and everyone around you, for what, a truckload of insured corporate assets?

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Driverless does not meant unmonitored. Aside from numerous sensors, including door sensors, you really think if it suddenly slows to 0 mph at an unscheduled time/location that it’s not going to alert someone? “Hey, your freight just stopped transporting itself. Guess we should do nothing”. Aside from most of these being ready to be taken over by a remote driver if need be for liability and convenience reasons.

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    What an incredibly infuriating waste of effort that would be so much better spent on trains, driverless or otherwise.

    • Redex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I disagree. There are many situations where a truck is better suited for transport than a train. The US already has a pretty large freight train network. I agree that there definitely should be more investment in rail as well, but there’s no reason for both not to exist at the same time.