• ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The point is outreach to the other platform. Sending engagement to this video on YouTube will boost it due to YouTube’s algorithm. More exposure on YouTube = more potential new PeerTube users. Publishing this on PeerTube is preaching to the choir. As an alternative platform, you always need to maintain a presence on the main platform so you can encourage people looking to leave.

      • thedruid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        It would better to make peer tube super easy to use without needing to do more than cluck once on. A button and get going

        The thing holding open source back is the gatekeeping. Developers could spend more time actually working with u.i experts to make things easy, but no. Rather make everyone think it’s some magic that requires 50 steps.

        Make it easy to do business and give them a great product. That’s all that needs to be done. Do that foss community, and you’ll win.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The main value of youtube for many of us is the enormous video collection, which is impractical for anyone else to duplicate. Need to fix an old washing machine (I did, recently)? Type in the make and model and there’s an instructional vid. It’s unfortunate that Google has exclusive control over such a resource, but here we are.

    • belit_deg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe a silly idea, but what about a P2P-based video hosting! Hear me out:

      We have more computing power and bandwith in our homes than ever before. We know that sharing data and files via P2P works, is resiliant against attacks, and scales really well.

      No server costs mean that people could support creators by seeding the content to other peers. One cool thing about that would be seeing how you are making a difference, in real time.

      • solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        The difficult part is not the software or even the hosting. It’s more about the network effects and the ability to let users monetize uploads, which in turn creates vast potential for abuse and fraud, which in turn has to be addressed by burning stupendous resources. At a certain point people stop wanting exposure or “making a difference” for their own sake, and instead want to get paid in genuine coin of the realm.

        • belit_deg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Absolutely, people still need money. So P2P would not solve that bit, but at least the donations can go directly towards content creation rather than having to cover server costs as well.

      • Bora M. Alper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        PeerTube started as being P2P based, hence the name. :) However, due to technical challenges associated with it, they dropped support for P2P streaming in 2023 (see the link for details).

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think we should discuss about what is holding PeerTube back. For starters a monetization system

  • sunth1ef@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Joined PeerTube last month and have had great success with it in terms of as a platform and place to share art / content, though of course the views have been low.

    I’m sure there is a megathread elsewhere but would love to see an acceleration of folks adopting the Fediverse. My talking point has been to sort of sell Fediverse alternatives (Lemmy, Pixelfed, Mastodon) as superior to other big tech alternatives out there (such as BlueSky and Flashes). We are either at the vanguard of a mass migration or just migrating while no one else is intending to, which I guess amounts to the same thing!

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s kinda true, but what does that have to do with the comment you replied to?

        • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It is related to the increased calls to encourage the adoption of free and open source software, which are alternatives to corporate products. 🙂

    • ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      There was a lot of energy around strategy when I joined in January (can you guess why? Lol). The limiting factor seems to be chosen participation. Lots of people have opinions, not many people want to organize their thoughts into, eg. an effective advertising campaign, a github pull request, or basically anything other than meaningless musing.

      Here were some threads in my message history I found insightful: https://lemmy.world/post/25512565 https://lemmy.world/post/25553607 https://lemmy.world/post/27824597

      I’m not really skilled in anything relevant, so my strategy has been:

      • On mainstream social platforms, point out any hint of enshittification and follow up with a recommendation toward a specific Fediverse alternative.
      • Link directly to discussions or articles I found on Lemmy that I thought were worth sharing
      • Building partnerships in my existing communities with the corresponding Lemmy communities to encourage user flow
      • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lots of people have opinions, not many people want to organize their thoughts into, eg. an effective advertising campaign, a github pull request, or basically anything other than meaningless musing.

        This is the nature of free work. Any donation of time is sparse and intermittent. People have bills to pay. The best and brightest want to be paid well for their time. This requires a business model of some kind, and monetising that work. This is antithetical to FOSS projects, and is the reason they will almost always be inferior to projects with large budgets with teams of UX designers. /obligatory COME AT ME BRO

        • ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ironically, I think Fediverse suffers from a high amount of tech expertise and not enough project managers, lol. Not enough people cracking the whip saying “users said x feels confusing, what can we do about it?” then establishing timelines and check-ins. Maybe instead of Lemmy devs saying, “we accept nearly every pull request,” they should say, “we want a project manager to help recruit volunteers on specific issues x, y, and z”.

          • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ironically, I think Fediverse suffers from a high amount of tech expertise and not enough project managers, lol.

            I 1,000% agree. FOSS projects are dominated by skilled developers who have to work under the direction of managers in their day jobs and FUCKING HATE IT. They dream about breaking the shackles of idiotic managers who are suppressing their talent and creativity, so they work on FOSS projects. Only to learn that developers without clear direction is like herding angry cats at a Metallica concert. The end result is a patchwork of features each developer would personally like, but normal people hate.

            I am probably biased here because I am one of those managers. The reason we don’t work on FOSS projects is because 1) they don’t want us working on them, and 2) we fucking hate our jobs as-is, and don’t want to spend one more minute than necessary herding angry cats.

    • Marthirial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Like with fucking, friction is the difference between pleasure and pain. If I click a YT link and the video starts playing, no lag, no buffering, just plays, I will come back.

      I tried to watch the French dude describing Texas, hosted on Peertube. It took 17 minutes, 3 attempts, 2 error messages, lag while playing.

      Can’t change the paradigm with thrift.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sometimes, I think that peertube would work better as simply being a different section of a personal/private website. You know how some sites hosted their own videos back before youtube became “the only place to post videos”? Gametrailers, Machinima, ThatGuyWithTheGlasses, etc.

    Federation helps with discovery, but not much beyond that, I think.