• clonedhuman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Investigators were alerted to his accounts after finding an unusually high number of log-ins and failed log-ins from an unfamiliar devices, locations, or networks. That information is tracked by Google, per the affidavit. Other unusual activity was traced through Payne’s VPN or network provider.

    So, Google stopped him, and his VPN provider. I’d like to know who his VPN provider was.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Messages from his burner phone, too, matched the number Payne had listed in his personal contact info while applying for unemployment benefits in February.

    If you put your real name on it or associate that phone number with your name, then doesn’t that stop meeting the definition of a burner phone?

    EDIT: I re-read the wording of the article, and I don’t think he used the burner phones number associated with his name as I posted before. The article says this:

    "Messages from his burner phone, too, matched the number Payne had listed in his personal contact info while applying for unemployment benefits in February. "

    It sounds like he used is REAL phone/number to apply for unemployment, but then at a later time he used is REAL phone to text a message to his burner phone. So the article is saying the “messages found on his burner phone” contained his REAL phone number. This would mean authorities would have had to have the burner phone in hand. So this wasn’t the way he was found, simply a way that it was confirmed it was him.

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      14 days ago

      Sure he’s dumb but his failure gives an interesting insight into how wide the US dragnet on its citizens is. A mail address used to apply for unemployment has been indexed somewhere « just in case ». Nice.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Storage and indexing is cheap. From a usability perspective indexing makes sense: call centre staff can tell someone why their unemployment application has been denied/delayed etc.

        From a security perspective, Google, Proton, and friends want to track failed login IPs so they can assign (internal) reputation scores to incoming requests.

        • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          It’s the sharing & cross enrichment that would bother me. That your unemployment office keeps a CRM with the info makes sense. That LEA has it all and more together with the gods know what else is what I would object to. Same for how service providers store that info; there’s a fine line between storing enough and too much. Or too long. And not everything needs to be tied forever to the customer ; sometimes a hash or whatever does wonder for the legitimate purpose. Storing more is often « just in case I can market the data later » which I’m personally not agreeing with.

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      “No b-because he was a bad guy so we can accuse him of other bad guy stuff too!”

      Inb4 police find “a mysterious white power” and never mention it again

  • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Seems like this might be one of the first ones that actually was a bit of a leftist, considering the use of the term “Swasticar,” which is a little interesting. Funny how the crazies on the far right seem to consistently get to the point where they’re able to obtain a firearm.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      Whats missing from the article is any kind of seized evidence that would show he had the means to actually carry out any of this threats. As in, could this just be a “talking tough” keyboard warrior? I’d expect they’d need to find lots of guns, poison, explosives, etc. There isn’t any mention of that kind of thing in the article.

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah, it says they’re charging him with something that has a max sentence of five years, seems like it would be a lot heavier if they could show he was planning to take action.