As GenX myself, I can identify with some of what was spoken of here, but I also have the self awareness that what GenX is now facing is essentially what Millennials have been facing for their entire time since entering the workforce 17 or 18 years ago.
I didn’t read the Generation X book until maybe mid to late 90s, but some of the stuff really hit home, especially thing about lessness. Also, in Microserfs I think it is he had a part where one of the characters’ dads was sitting in his car after getting canned from IBM after decades of work - that really hit close to home, since my own father went through something very analogous to that.
Some of the comments on DU are pretty poignant, I think.
I honestly wonder once there is a closer inspection, it might turn out that Gen Y and Gen Z might actually fare better in some ways - it certainly seems they are going to get a massive wealth transfer. When I entered the market, it was during a recession. Things were okay for a bit in the mid to late 90s, but I was facing a lot of age discrimination aimed at people that were younger. I start digging out of debt and almost bought a new car and then didn’t (thankfully), then the dot-com bubble started to burst and 9/11 hit and things were fucked for years in IT. I made way less than I did before and went through multiple layoffs. Just when things are getting sorta stable again, along comes the real-estate crash and causes more layoffs…IT/engineering has always been boom and bust though, and so it’s hardly something relegated to any one generation, I guess. And now, with the ageism on the other end of the equation, there is pressure trying to people in my age bracket out of a job…which is really fucking ironic when people bitch about how “no one wants to work”.
Yeah, if people - and by that, I mean corporations - only value workers between a very narrow range of ages - say, 30-40, ideally with no kids and no responsibilities outside of work of any kind, and everyone else gets kind of the side-eye, can you blame people that start looking for ways to get out of the rat race “early” (meaning, in their 40s or 50s) or can you blame the very young for getting tired of being side-lined in a different way until they are “experienced” (but not too experienced as to demand too much money).
It’d be nice if our culture would stop with wanting only a very narrow range of ages when it comes to work. I get that you want people with some experience, but often those are set very arbitrarily as gate-keeping, and then, on the other side of it, the culture is trying to push people out that are “too old”…a whole lot of people actually do want to work, and into a very late age in fact but ageism is still not only politically correct, but actively sanctioned by the culture.
TL;DR: billionaire class screwing the next in line.
Does the NYT spell that out?
Reader, they do not.
screwing the next in line.
Honestly, I feel like this understates it. They’re destroying creative communities and obliterating the knowledge of artistic techniques that were passed through those communities because those techniques aren’t deemed to have any market value, which leads us all into a world filled with generic and boring songs and stories being built from widely used materials and perspectives and pushed through generic structures. They’re effectively setting fire to the library of books that haven’t been written yet.
You’re not wrong.
deleted by creator
Most jobs are fake and society would be fine if they didn’t exist.
If the only jobs we did were to maintain the needs of the people who make up our society we could all retire before 40 or even 30 for the hard workers.
Capitalism is a scam and we’re wasting our lives and the future of our species on the wants of like 3,000 nepo babies.
Back in the 50s they claimed automation would lead to 20 hour work weeks and that our biggest problem would be filling our free time.
They didn’t account for people making up bullshit jobs and both political parties making “MOAR JOBS” the only thing they agree on.
Yeah, when you read transhumanist/futurist type of stuff and try to square that with a whole lot of people still operating with a linear mindset that think the next 10 years will be just like the last 10, it’s quite a bit of cultural cognitive dissonance. I think a lot of this will have to be reconciled one way or another.
I’m assuming America will choose the stupidest way possible, like electing a dipshit such as donvict who cannot even handle the old system very well. And forget about getting leadership thinking about a way to transition to a post-scarcity economy that doesn’t involve just transferring ALL the wealth to people like convict and fElon while they think about how to “downsize” all of the “useless eaters”.
If I could have one ask of advances in technology and things like age extension, etc…is that somehow, someway, developments in getting massive intellect AS WELL AS wisdom and morality acceleration in humans come online to go with it. Otherwise, we are just talking about apes with nukes, if there is no wisdom, morality and intellect to go with it… I’ve watched as the Internet became available to all and hoped it would make us all smarter and more media savvy; instead it’s helped to give rise to things like the alt-right and putting the convicted felon into office. Also, now more than ever, people seem to be proudly clinging onto the notion of being anti-intellectuals.
So…I have my doubts.