Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth denied allegations that he texted classified war plans to a Signal group chat that mistakenly included The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg.

The National Security Council confirmed the chat’s authenticity but called the inclusion of Goldberg an inadvertent mistake.

Lawmakers from both parties demanded investigations, with former CIA Director Leon Panetta warning of potential espionage violations.

Hegseth dismissed Goldberg as a “deceitful” journalist. Trump denied knowledge of the incident.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    9 days ago

    He knows they have the screenshots and the NSC confirmed it, right?

    https://x.com/JenGriffinFNC/status/1904221405618577650

    NSC statement:  “At this time, the message thread that was reported appears to be authentic, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain. The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to our servicemembers or our  national security.” - NSC Spokesman Brian Hughes

    The Trump administration does not deny this Signal group chat about the war planning for the Yemen strikes is real. Trump’s top national security advisers added reporter

    @JeffreyGoldberg

    @TheAtlantic

    to the war planning text chain on non-government social media app, perhaps breaking secrecy laws. Read this shocking story below.

  • corroded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 days ago

    Even if everyone in the chat had a need-to-know, you do not use insecure 3rd-party software for classified communications. Secure networks already exist for this.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Doesn’t protect from FOIA, if you use your phone for official communication and it stores records, your phone can be FOIA’d.

        • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          According to the original article, the messages were set to auto delete after a max of 4 weeks :)

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 days ago

    Lmfao

    The editor in chief of The Atlantic wrote an op-ed on the whole episode, and they have corroborated and confirmed from multiple sources that he was, indeed, inadvertently shown data that is considered SCI in a Signal group chat that was likely conducted through the personal devices of administration officials.

    There is no debate here. That happened. This is like rear ending someone in your car and totaling both vehicles and just refusing to even acknowledge that you even felt anything.

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      I agree with your position, but think it’s even worse than the situation depicted in your analogy because of the security implications and the accountability implications. I don’t know how to represent those in your analogy, though. Lol

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    8 days ago

    These fucking guys only ever lie and deny.

    Are we really too stupid and weak as a country to be able to do anything about this?

    • pubquiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      It would seem the case - the US is impotent while the sitting president twiddles his thumbs and denies knowing his upper eschelon staff are using unsecure comms. Makes me laugh about the tough-guy image they want versus the limp-dick energy the display.

  • Helvetica@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    9 days ago

    He’s going with the Shaggy defense? “It wasn’t me”. I mean, it works for them. It will probably all blow over because no one is going to do anything. But this should absolutely destroy him.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 days ago

    "You’re talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who’s made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again…This is a guy who peddles in garbage.

    Hegseth then added, “oh wait, that’s me.”

    • andallthat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      yes, so typical and yet so effective so far.

      Phase 1: eat a baby in plain view at a crowded event

      Phase 2: get really angry and personally attack anybody who mentions it and their employer

      Phase 3: after a few days just roll your eyes and dismiss with “again with that baby thing?”

      If nothing serious happens right after phase 1, holding onto this as future political ammo seems to be worthless. I really hope I’m wrong and that the accumulation of these things is enough to turn enough of Trump’s base against him but they accumulated a whole fricking lot by now and there is still room for more…