• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    People are arguing about autopilot being disabled during the drive, but even if it was, the emergency braking system should tried to do something.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Mark did an interview with Philip Defranco and posted raw footage showing/explaining that Autopilot turned itself off instead of hitting the brakes.

      They also did two takes, it did the same thing both times. The first time, they just used a poster instead of a full foam wall. They decided to add the foam for a better visual once they realized it would just happily plow through it.

      Finally there’s some argument of Autopilot vs FSD; but both rely on the same cameras and should have at least tried to brake. The LIDAR car braked and it was just using emergency braking, no self driving at all.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Why would it? It sees a road in front of itself, the whole car is built + programmed to go by what it sees, as an image.

      The car is doing exactly what it is built to do. It just so happens that “safety of road traffic” is not among the things it is built for, and explicitly so.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    17 days ago

    I love that they had pre-cut the styrofoam wall in a cartoony hole shape because they knew it was going to happen.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    You know, with how distracted your average Tesla driver is, I’m pretty sure this would trick them even with them “driving” with AP on.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      17 days ago

      Teslas famously don’t use lidar because Musk declared that cameras were good enough. Reality disagrees, but reality owns no shares of Tesla.

    • TheCoralReefsAreDying69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      A decent camera only vision system should still be able to detect the wall. I was actually shocked at the fact that Tesla failed this test so egregiously.

      If you use two side by side cameras you can determine distance to a feature by calculating the offset in position of the feature between the two camera images. I had always assumed this was how Tesla planned to achieve camera only FSD, but that would make too much sense.

      https://www.intelrealsense.com/stereo-depth-vision-basics/

      Even if they wanted to avoid any redundant hardware and only go with one camera for each direction, there is still a chance they could’ve avoided this kind of issue if they used structure through motion, but that’s much harder to do if the objects could be moving.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_from_motion

    • Decq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 days ago

      The FSD promise was mostly just market manipulation. Sure they might actually get it done at some point. But the time line they proposed was just a scam. And it worked seeing the market cap.

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 days ago

    I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back home, they’re not much bigger than 2 meters.

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Humans with two working eyes can tell the difference between a flat painted surface and a 3D world. Humans with only one eye might crash, though.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 days ago

        I doubt someone without depth perception would crash either. They’d notice the straps on the side, and things not being the exact colour shade. Might think it was a big piece of glass set up on the road, but that wouldn’t be something you’d just plow through.

  • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    17 days ago

    Not defending Tesla or anything but let’s not pretend like the majority of people on the road looking at their phone would not have done the exact same thing

    • Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      Someone should make looking at your phone while driving illegal. Maybe even slap it with a catchy name like “distracted driving” and make the issue a whole big deal.