Tech workers react to UPS drivers landing a $170,000 a year package with a mixture of anger and admiration::Some tech workers questioned whether UPS drivers deserved high pay — others jumped in to note the importance of the jobs and harsh working conditions.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    ·
    2 years ago

    The amount of shit a delivery driver puts up with? They certainly deserve it. Good on them, we should all be well paid, and thinking otherwise is Stockholm syndrome.

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    2 years ago

    tech workers: i’m underpaid and everyone else should be too!

    fucking unionize already. tired of this crabs-in-a-bucket mentality

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      2 years ago

      Or, perhaps this article is just trying to sow discord between workers.

      One of the old tricks in the books to make people despise unions is to take the very best union deals and sensationalize them, so that others hate the union out of jealousy.

      Make it appear like the UPS driver is getting paid $170K for 32 hours of work, in a fully A/C’d vehicle on a short, easy route, starting pay, right out of college without a degree, four weeks of vacation yada yada.

      When in reality, the $170K probably only kicks in if you take the absolute worst routes, worst shifts (weekend/night) with max overtime and even then, a third of it is retirement, insurance and health care contributions. And you only get the max after 10 or 20 years of service, if they didn’t fire you as you increased.

      • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        2 years ago

        During an earnings call on Tuesday, UPS CEO Carol Tomé said that by the end of its five-year contract with the Teamsters union, the average full-time UPS driver would make about $170,000 in annual pay and benefits, such as healthcare and pension benefits.

        The headline is sensationalized for sure. But the article itself actually makes the point that the tech workers are misunderstanding that the $170k figure includes both salary and benefits.

        “This is disappointing, how is possible that a driver makes much more than average Engineer in R&D?” a worker at the autonomous trucking company TuSimple wrote on Blind, an anonymous jop-posting site that verifies users’ employment using their company email. “To get a base salary of $170k you know you need to work hard as an Engineer, this sucks.”

        It is important to note that the $170,000 figure represents the entire value of the UPS package, including benefits and does not represent the base salary. Currently, UPS drivers make an average of around $95,000 per year with an additional $50,000 in benefits, according to the company. The average median salary for an engineer in the US is $103,845 with a base pay of about $91,958, according to Glassdoor. And TuSimple research engineers can make between $161,000 to $250,000 in compensation, Glassdoor data shows.

        On the whole though this is a useless article covering drama on Blind, wrapped up with a ragebait headline.

    • Drop_All_Users@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      They’re quoting Blind users though, Blind is a cesspool of silicon Valley tech bros. It’s often just a dick measuring contest between FAANG workers about who makes more money.

    • rhokwar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a fellow tech worker, I agree. Probably most tech workers would agree, but since that’s boring, this article focuses on the opinion of just “some tech workers on social media”. So dumb.

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        Like 3 ancient jaded guys that are working on network infrastructure for a small hospital in Montana posted on Xwitter that they’re upset. 10000 bots reposted it…now it’s newsworthy.

        • Jagger2097@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Xwitter

          I’m going with Xitter pronounced sh-ITT-er That makes tweets Xits pronounced sh-IT-s

  • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is a little misleading. It’s $170k in pay and benefits, not just salary. Still, UPS drivers deserve it and this will make everyone’s experience with UPS so much better.

  • elscallr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 years ago

    As one of the tech workers: fuck yeah, good for them for negotiating well, and getting what they’re owed.

  • monkeyman512@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have worked as a driver helper in the past. This pay makes sense. It’s a demanding job mentally and physically. With the pay being good it also means people work really hard to get that job and really hard to keep it. Congratulations to them.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    A UPS driving job is a hell of a lot more difficult and tiring than most tech jobs. It might take less skill, but tech workers don’t have to be out in the heat or freezing cold all day carrying heavy loads and dealing with angry people who blame them for a late package or, worse, get shot at for the crime of being in the neighborhood while black.

  • Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I work in tech and have enjoyed good salaries, I wish everyone was so fortunate.

    As for myself, it would actually be a huge relief to know that there are many career options for me that paid just as well, because sometimes I really want to do something else. If wages had grown fairly, then a lot more people would be making 100,000+.

  • ZooGuru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    Complaining about this is dumb. Someone else’s gain isn’t your loss. Everyone outside the top tier earners should be paid more. Period. I’m happy a union had the national stage representing UPS workers and showed why unions are important.

  • ObsidianBlk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    As someone in tech who also has a friend that works for UPS, this is amazing for them! Anything that can improve their lives is a win. UPS people who incredibly hard (regardless of how much shit I give my friend when UPS does something silly with my deliveries)

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      My housing development is a confusing maze of twisty streets. The street I live on takes multiple turns where another street starts when my street should have gone straight on. My UPS person deserves every penny just for being able to figure out which house is which.

  • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a tech worker for over 25 years, I say good for them.

    Hell, if my back, knees and neck weren’t already fucked, I’d be damned tempted to start driving for UPS.

    I’m already kind of nearing a point where a move away from tech is appealing, but even if I accept the idea of some reduction in pay, I’m at a loss for what I can do that wouldn’t see me losing half my income which would just be more than I’d like to bear.

  • scottywh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    I know someone in his 20s who makes $41 and some change per hour plus $150 per diem…

    7 days on and 7 days off…

    “Unskilled” coal mine work.

    It’s pretty damn insulting to be honest as someone who’s been in the technology industry for over 25 years when I have to deal with companies and recruiters thinking that my labor is somehow worth less than that.

    Hell, I made more than that 18 years ago (and I still do as an hourly without the per diem) but now I get dipshit recruiters emailing and calling me constantly thinking I should be willing to work for $25 an hour or even sometimes less.

    It’s like I’m living in fucking crazy world.

    • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I would still try to fight for more than you make. It will be tough, don’t get me wrong, but I think most industries are in this position one way or another. Everything is going up, and everyone has to eat. Why can’t everyone make more, so less people suffer? The costs for everyone have certainly increased. A lot of these “record profits” should really be finding their way to employees, but they rarely do anymore.

      With the “unskilled coal mine work” example specifically, I believe a big reason for their pay rate is the numerous immediate and long term health risks that are associated with it. Historically, mining has been a pretty fatal/dangerous job. They miners will probably need that money down the road if they get any of those bad conditions. It’s certainly not a job that I would feel safe doing, nor is it one I would ever do for cheap. You should look into all of the associated lung diseases and ths effects that certain mined materials can have on the human body, especially with prolonged exposure. PPE can only do so much sometimes.

      When I see people making more than me with less skill, I think “damn, I should be making that too”. Why can’t both jobs have good pay rates? Both would be nice. What a world we live in.

      If you can, unionizing might help. It takes the company perspective from “we’ll lose one great guy” to “holy shit, everything will crash and burn if we don’t meet their demands!”. I would also look into the laws in your area. Where I live, unions can protect you well before you actually create a contract. That knowledge was very useful to my coworkers and I a couple of years ago, because we previously thought that they could just fire us for trying to join a union (jobs are at-will here).

      If you get a good union, the pros can outweigh the fees easily. They can cut right through a LOT of corporate bs, and they will usually provide lawyers for you if your company tries to screw you over. The lawyers mine provides are pretty top-tier.

  • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    This reminds me of what happened at my last job towards the end of the lockdown. Previously, you started at a certain wage and increased a specific amount every 500ish hours, up to a limit. The last “raise” was only like 4 cents, but you still had to work the extra 500ish hours to get it.

    Well, the company decided that they weren’t paying enough to be competitive, so they suddenly raised everyone to the top rate. This put people who just started their very first job at the same pay rate as the people who had been there for multiple years. Their “solution” was to give the long term employees a one off, taxed, check for $200. To say that people were angry would be an understatement.

    Personally, I think they should have just increased everyone across the board, especially after previously bragging about making record profits multiple years in a row.

    IMO, when someone else makes more, it gives me room to also argue for more. Otherwise, why not go to another company that will pay it? Getting angry at the guy with the raise won’t give you one. Inflation will still happen.