• Cid Vicious@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well when they’re saying there’s 2% odds, that’s…probably still higher than you want for the probability of a world ending asteroid strike.

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not a world ending strike. It’s 2.3% odds that a city ending strike lands somewhere on earth, most likely in the ocean.

      It’s a fraction of a fraction of a % that it’ll hit somewhere with any humans at all, much less a populated city.

      And on top of that, we have until 2032 to decide what to do about it, with enough time to potentially redirect it with technology we’ve already demonstrated that works. And if that isn’t enough, we just need one or two more data points to figure out almost exactly where it will hit, and can evacuate the area.

      Just like we do for hurricanes and other natural disasters.

      This is not an emergency, this is an easy mode try out for a real disaster.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is not an emergency, this is an easy mode try out for a real disaster.

        So it’s going to be horribly fumbled in the stupidest manner possible and will definitely become a worldwide disaster. Got it.

        • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The caveat to THAT is that we do have historical data, and if we can find one or more images confirmed to be the target, we could narrow it down without additional imaging.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        City ending will cause weather chaos and possibly radioactive fallout.

        But the funny part is that you think 2032 is enough time. Humans are USELESS when we need to do large international projects to a deadline.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s a great video by Scott Manly on the subject if you want to learn more. It’d smaller than some nukes we’ve tested, and would land somewhere around the equator between the Atlantic and China if it does hit. It looks surprisingly feasible to deflect, but it’d be a time crunch to put a mission together in only a couple of months. Plus it might deflect it into hitting a different country.

      https://youtu.be/kK5IXX4p2d0