In the past, we’ve had issues with women suffrage, slavery, and sanitation, among many other things.

Today we have gun control, AI, intended/unintended false information, vaccines, etc. as consistently hot topics.

In a few decades’ time, what views do you have now that may spark major social debate in the future? What conservative and/or progressive stances do you take today that might be too far on either extreme in the far future?

  • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not a vegan or vegetarian, but I think anything related to animal rights and eating meat will probably be controversial in the future. We can lab grow meat, but you still choose to kill an actual animal for food? Canceled in 2050. Rightfully so I’d even say.

    • zefiax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s really hard to give up meat completely for me so I am trying to at least cut back by eating meat only every other day. Hopefully we can just move to lab grown meat that’s not detrimental to the environment so that I can enjoy meat without guilt again.

  • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 years ago

    The right to privacy. Just because I don’t want someone watching me 24/7 doesn’t mean I’m up to no good

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The ever encroaching “tough on crime” stance. Politicians push to make more and more things criminal and with worsening penalties. Many punishments seem disproportionately cruel or long for the crime. It’s political suicide to say that we should treat our felons better or to reduce sentencing right now.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, we can’t even agree to stop torturing inmates with solitary confinement or 110°F temperatures, and whenever I bring this up I always get pushback about how prison isn’t supposed to be fun.

      Well, yeah; it’s also not supposed to be torture.

  • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Religion gas to go. The way we rarm animals is barbaric. People should be able to pull the plug if they don’t want to live anymore.

    • Venator@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Once lab grown meat is common, farms will seem even more cruel to people of the future.

      I know religion seems like an obvious scapegoat for a lot of problems, but gassing them seems a bit extreme 😜🤣

  • fiat_lux@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    Disability rights, equal access to nutrition (not just edible items but actually nutritious food), equal access to electricity especially for cooling.

    I suspect the resource wars will ramp up with climate change, driving a lot of international conflict of all types.

  • UnD3Rgr0uNDCL0wN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    That the internet is not as important as people think it is. Opinions can seem like they’re popular in a bubble, but outside in the real world when you really get to know people its both a blessing and an insight.

    • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I half agree, internet is important to have access to all views available. The problem now is that it’s profitable to keep people in their own bubble as most are to lazy to look at more then 1-2 sources for their info and loads limit themselves to corporation (facebook for one) or government regulated sources (freely in the US or by force in Russia and China).

      A lot of people are dissuaded to think for themselves, which is killing for a source with this much info of which a lot is garbage. Internet went downhill when the commoners were given access and thus the corporation found a new place to fleece money from them. (and yes, this could be considered as a garbage opinion as well ;) )

  • wmrch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is an old one for many countries…but I fear a housing crisis in Germany.

    Right now it’s not as prevalent as in the us for example but there are no steps taken to prevent it becoming a major social issue.

    • Construction industry suffers from high prices and a lack of workforce
    • The only housing that is being worked on are luxury properties
    • Infrastructure development in rural areas where housing is still affordable is not progressing
    • Regulations and hurdles for new buildings are more difficult and complex than anywhere else
    • Real estate ownership is often only possible through inheritance/generational wealth, as income is extremely highly taxed
    • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Looks familiar. We already have the same issue in The Netherlands (Hi neighbour).

      1st time buyers can’t get a house as they are to expensive, current owners can’t move on as they 1st need to sell before they can buy something (and hope that the selling prize covers the mortgage costs), social letting (entry level) has an issue with availability of houses and most others for the letting market are in the unregulated market and those houses are being sold off as the letting out of houses in that market is being regulated so much that it’s not economical anymore.

      On top of that, it’s to expensive to build new houses and the country is already needs 1m houses in the next few years. Due to this the right wing is hammering on stopping refugees entering the country when they are about 5% of the immigration issue. (expats are the other 95%)

    • xylogx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      If someone injures you through a false statement of fact you can sue them for libel.

      It is hard to do more than that without encroaching on free speech: people are entitled to their opinions. That said , free speech is not absolute and has linits.

    • 667@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Seems like conspiracy statutes tend to cover lying pretty well, and lying under oath is perjury. What other ways could lying be covered?

  • PaperTowel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I love fishing recreationally but I could totally understand if it became totally taboo in the future.

  • CharAhNalaar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Here’s an issue that people won’t talk about that they need to: the right to commit crimes. Just because something is illegal doesn’t mean it’s immoral, and the growing belief on multiple fronts that a criminal justice system should be “perfect” is what’s driving a lot of the erosion of privacy rights, among other things.

  • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m thinking all current issues will boil down to 1 major issue, to many humans on to little space. The human race is still growing in numbers while the livable space on earth is diminishing fast (even simply ignoring the dwindling clean fresh water supply and options to grow food). Either we need to stop the growth or get off this rock.

    As loads of humans still think that nature doesn’t include them and they are not part of the diminishing biodiversity, it doesn’t look good for the foreseeable future. Maybe in a few centuries when we’re either down to 1-2 billion (or less) or have spread out into the universe.

  • smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Bit late to this, but I have a couple of big ones:

    1. Once brain uploading becomes a thing, the code/data of an uploaded person should be sacrosanct. You can’t look at it, you can’t fuck with it, unless they give you consent to do so.

    2. Once it becomes a possibility, every human should either move off-world or revert back to a hunter-gatherer existence. Humans in general have been a disaster for the biosphere, but especially once we started settling down and farming, and even more so once industrialisation became a thing. Earth needs time to heal from the damage we have done to it, and that means most people + all our industry and technology fucking off into space. Namely into space colonies, big rotating cans of steel the size of large islands, filled with dirt, air, water and artificial biospheres.