Top notch banter.

Every wankpanzer ever? I had to check it wasn’t the onion. It’s not the onion.

Are these British or Canadian aliens, perhaps, or is apologising to inanimate objects and people who walk in to you more universal?

No, the generation that killed Nazis is the silent generation. Boomers are their children.

Probably hadn’t paid the monthly subscription for the emergency door non-locking software.

I don’t think it’s road legal in the EU. something about not passing safety tests.

Starving the children to fund tax cuts for billionaires.

Starving the kids to own the libs

Republicans hate clever people.

It’s teal.

OP is probably high.

You were high when you wrote this question, weren’t you.

Literally, if you take away the time and lyrics, what’s left is the karaoke backing track, and it’s a big part of why you feel the way you feel when you listen to the song, but the words and the tune are too.

A pattern of notes is a tune. A pattern of words is a poem. A pattern of vibes is a … what?

There isn’t a word for this, because there isn’t an effective way to record or communicate it without the words and/or music, so there’s need to talk about it without referring to the words and/or music that inspired it.

Critical questions include who would handle federal funding for low-income schools, disability programs, and civil rights enforcement.

Why would you think that president Musk or vice president Trump want any of those things to continue to be funded?

Still mathematically incorrect, I’m afraid.

Your point isn’t valid because “people who voted” is certainly not a random sample but it is also not an unbiased or stratified sample of the population.

It’s very plausible indeed that (for example) democratic leaning voters were jaded and stayed home whilst republicans were excited about the disruptive influence their guy mightt have.

Your sample contains no eligible voters whatsoever in the stayed-home category and it’s heinous extrapolation to assume that your proportion extends into this group with markedly different behaviour to those in your sample, especially when the percentages were so close in any case.

Using your logic, I could do a hypothesis test with a tiny sample of hundred voters and get my margin of error under a SL of 5% and claim statistical significance, because if I excluded people who voted in person or people who voted by postal vote, I would get strikingly different outcomes. Thus, if voter preference is correlated so markedly even by method of voting, it’s absurd to suggest that there’s no correlation over fact of voting.

By your logic (statistical significance irrespective of how non-random and non-stratified a sample is), no pre election poll could ever be wrong.

Statistical significance isn’t the same as truth. How representive and free from bias your sample is are two things that are critical to the validity of your conclusions.

Wrong, just wrong.

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-11-15/how-many-people-didnt-vote-in-the-2024-election

36% of eligible voters did not vote. That’s more people than voted for Trump.

It’s the ceasefire Biden’s team that nearly got accepted until Trump phoned up his pal Netanyahu to tell him not to do it until he got elected.

SOMEONE’S TAKEN THE GREEN ONES TOO NOW! HELP!

34-time convicted felon elected president.

Greedy billionaire befriends orange felon moron, interferes with the voting technology and bribes voters to buy the election for his pet moron dictator.

Greedy billionaire siezes control of federal payments system.

What could possibly go wrong?

I’m not sure that’s an either / or situation.

Home electricity in North America has roughly half the voltage as elsewhere in the world, and double the voltage is double the arcing potential, so that figures.