

Because we assume innocence without evidence?
Because we assume innocence without evidence?
Probably. Hardware stores usually like dogs visiting.
Honestly though I think they just do it for more business.
As someone who has one, it really only covers you being able to rent a place if you have an esa
And that attitude is why they don’t seek help
You mean that magical unlimited thing that just flows freely from the walls?
People don’t think about the energy wasted to do that
Bravely runs away away?
Yeah, but they hold hands when they sleep and break clams on their tummies!!!
Alright, Florida Man, you’re up.
Call, Raise, or Fold?
Is this that trump train i kept hearing about?
Yes, that does factor into it quite heavily.
I hope in real life you don’t come across as as much of a dick as you do here
I think you mean gawd awful liar
I honestly believed trump was a democrat plant to guarantee Hillary one.
They’re going to reveal the whole trump presidency was fake any minute now.
Right guys? Please?
For examples please see Fidel Castro
So you had more information and decided to link only the small sample size on gamblers one?
Seems to me you started this looking for a fight and a gotcha moment now, otherwise why use your worst study first and alone?
Cool, huh?
You just want to try and feel superior to others and your “study” involved 82 people.
That is too small of a sample size to be worth anything, especially since they were dealing with gambling, you know that thing that produces addictive dopamine spikes, and is therefore biased from the beginning.
Oh I understood you, it was a little difficult with your head shoved so far up your own ass on that pedestal you built for yourself, but i managed.
Really? You want to try and play that card mr mengele?
And yet none of that is conclusive evidence of it being because of someone else’s race. I agree that it probably was, but we have no proof