Propaganda can be spread like wild fire

No and neither can 5G

Acetaminophen doesn’t cause addiction. Pls stop spreading propaganda. Acetaminophen doesn’t cause euphoria and there is no withdrawal.

Spreading propaganda is addictive.

Yes, it is the essence. Words can hurt. That’s what we have been telling people.

Highly skilled immigrants from countries with authoritarian regimes are immigrants (among other reasons, mostly) because of those regimes. Makes sense that they’ll go back to their own authoritarian regime when the country they’ve immigrated to becomes authoritarian as well.

Fascism in your own (ie born and raised) country is bad, fascism where you’re an immigrant is much worse.

Luv it. Also China actually isn’t as bad as we think. They are one step behind us. If we are not carefully, they will overtake us financially, technologically and even democratically.

Putin must be dancing now

I’ll never really understand why so many Indians think white supremacists…

Havent you watched indian tv commercials? All those whitening face cream? Years of being ruled by England, they are used to please white supremacists

Yes and no. It depends on how Americanocentric your question is.

Many collectivistic societies are more conservative than individualistic societies; however, collectivistic societies trend to be less discriminatory to minorities and more forgiving.

What exactly do you mean “progressive”?

Question too vague

I weep for him. This administration has gone mad and those voted for him are just guilty.

I am not going to Thanksgiving this year. I am not going to pretend everything is okay and let the Trump support lead the family prayer when she is such a bad witness.

Teenage boy scientists

Actually American Americans are the “Pharisees”. They just hate to be called to be called out by Jesus.

They act like Pharisees. They talk like Pharisees. I hope they will be judged like Pharisees.

Not AI. It is me. The abstract is posted on the primary source Nature. Here is the citation Post updated to included citation. Sry. Not AI. Just human error Turcsán, B., Ujfalussy, D.J., Kerepesi, A. et al. Similarities and differences between dog–human and human–human relationships. Sci Rep 15, 11871 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95515-8

Sorry. I should have included citation. What AI? It is an actual study posted on Nature. I read the study on the primary source. It is the abstract. PsyPost reposts and summarises it. I should have posted the citation. Sorry Here is the citation.

Turcsán, B., Ujfalussy, D.J., Kerepesi, A. et al. Similarities and differences between dog–human and human–human relationships. Sci Rep 15, 11871 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95515-8

Point is parents don’t judge their children ( not as much) and dogs don’t judge us. We love children unconditionally (to some extent) and dogs love us unconditionally.

Our children, they love us unconditionally only until they to grow to certain age.

That’s will most people prefer dogs generally. They are exceptions. But generally it holds true.

Are those poen tapes? Sticky VHS are messy…

Refuse to air? We will just watch it online. Local TV stations are dead anyway

He probably cares about his lover, Putin

One can be never too smart not to know their limits.

The point is a smart person knows his or her limits. It is safer to be conservative and underestimate.

In many collectivistic societirs, humility is a virtue.