For example, let’s say Bernie Sanders was the nominee in 2024 against Trump. A lot of people on the internet seem to like him, even some conservatives. But would liberals fall in line and vote for him enough to beat Trump?

Bernie’s supporters always seem to attack the Democrats liberal base, do you think they’d sit home if Bernie or any leftist was the nominee.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      You know when conservatives post pictures of counties being all one color thus showing significant voting support most people speak up about how land doesn’t vote and explain why those maps are kind of useless. Just food for thought.

      • PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        my thought immediately when seeing this. interesting to see the geographic spread but misleading to frame it as more area = more popular

  • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I sincerely have no idea.

    The narrative that a leftist couldn’t win is repeated so predictably and so often and by so many people that the whole idea has become sort of detached from reality, and there’s no telling what would happen if it was actually a possibility.

    And particularly since the one thing I’d pretty much guarantee is that the concerted efforts on the part of the ruling class to prevent a leftist from running would be as nothing compared to what they’d do and say in order to prevent one from winning.

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Assuming Bernie could get on the ticket, I absolutely believe people would have voted for him.

    The problem is of course getting him on the ticket.

  • NigahigaYT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s fair to say that ~80% of voters will just follow whatever their party’s media outlets say they should vote for. If a proper leftist and actually got the DNC nomination, I don’t think many classic liberals would think twice about voting for them.

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    No. When you leave social media echo chambers like Lemmy, you hear liberals and others right of center talking about how Kamala was too liberal.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s just the dishonest pundets though… and the people ratcheting the Dems right. Kamala ran on a Y2K republican program and got annihilated because Y2K republicans are now maga and there are no moderate republicans.

  • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, at least for me, the question is “Who?”

    In more ways than one. It’s quite evident to me now that a candidate needs to be charismatic, not just have some good ideas, to motivate voters to take their side. But “leftism” and “leftist” are still pretty vague labels. Just personally, some of the left-wing figures in the US today would earn my vote and some would not. More broadly, and I think there’d be a big difference between voters-at-large’s willingness to accept Bernie-esque proposals and some of the more out-there stuff I’ve seen.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Absolutely not. Type “Lamont Lieberman” (without the quotes) into a search engine for more info. Also “Clinton puma”. In the opposite direction, Kamala Harris lost a lot of Biden voters. Biden was considered relatively left of center (though nowhere near as leftist as Sanders) back in the day.