• spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This is misleading because being higher up you can see much better further ahead, and over obstacles and barriers. Your special awareness is much better at distances that are relevant for avoiding collisions. If something is 1.5m away its too late anyway.

      The angle is also incorrect because they are putting the eyes of the driver straight in line with the hood, which is not how its been in any vehicle I’ve ever driven, the head should be higher or further forward.

      • Voyajer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        11 months ago

        The origin of the line is at head height…

        Also these vehicles gain in distant visibility at the expense of everyone else on the road, blocking their views.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        You don’t want to see “over” obstacles close to your vehicle when said obstacles are in fact human beings standing in front of your car.

        At parking lot speeds, 1.5 meters is also not “too late,” and it certainly isn’t when you are at a standstill but need to determine if it is safe to move or if there is a small person in front of your vehicle, i.e. in the school pickup line, or in a parking lot, or your own driveway.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Ooo ooo we can do it like buses do. We’ll put a bar on the front that folds out. 3 year olds totally know what that is right? They’ll just get out of the way!

          (/s)

  • workerONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why do little cars have to withstand a collision with a huge truck but trucks just get bigger and bigger? The new Hummer is over 9,000lbs (4,090 kg)

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Trying to imagine my old Civic doing that …… holy shit that engine is winding up, glowing red hot, and I probably needed rocket boosters!

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        The only 93 Civic that hit 120mph was falling out of a plane at 35000’.

      • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean they’re getting heavier, but not, like, whole number multiples heavier. An electric might be some 60% heavier than a comparable gas car. But the aforementioned hummer is more than 5 times heavier than even a heavy electric “utility vehicle”. That’s more than 400% heavier.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Huh? Are you saying heavy electric utility vehicles are less than 2k lbs? I think you’re math is a bit off, or I’m misunderstanding you. 9k lbs is heavy but it’s only around 2k lbs heavier than it’s gas counter parts (most SUVs are around 6.5-7k lbs). Most electric cars are 1-2k lbs heavier than their gas counterparts already. Batteries are not light.

          • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I’m saying smaller cars are usually lighter than bigger cars, even when the smaller cars are electric. And the car I was comparing to was the Chevrolet bolt “electric utility vehicle” that’s trying to be an electric SUV. Which is 1600 kg.

            Where a Ford fiesta that’s almost the same size is still 1100 kg.

            Edit: corrected units to kg.

    • modeler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re in the process of describing a Cybertruck, just the misfitting panel ‘teeth’ aren’t rotating

  • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Humans have quite literally invented cars that are better at killing people, especially children.

    “I don’t want children to die in accidents,” say people as they drive huge masses of metal that might do just that.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ll keep driving my PEV Minivan that has 360 cameras and I can see in front of me easily. I care about children’s lives, unlike bubba in his lifted pickup truck. Why do you need a 4x4 lifted 3 feet and you live in the suburbs?

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, but mini vans aren’t lifted 20 ft off the ground with absurdly huge hoods for no apparent reason.

          The reason trucks and SUVs are killing kids is because you can see a 4ft tall person that isn’t standing 100 yards in front. These are the only vehicles with this problem.

          • dafo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            But it’s still blocking the view for us in normal sizes cars.

            I don’t know how many times I’ve had to hope for the best and carefully inch forwards/backwards when being next to a minivan/SUV/pickup. I’ve been close to being in an accident a number of times because of, well mostly, SUVs.

  • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I have a Honda Fit (compact 4 seater) and absolutely LOVE the little car, plus it’s easier to park. But holy shit looking for a compact is hard! Everything is a fucking SUV or truck these days! Just count the number of sedans vs SUVs next time you’re out and about. My favorite cars, the 2 door Mini Cooper and VW Buggy, aren’t even made any more.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Some of that is crumple zones and airbags, but yes there’s pretty much nothing for “small” cars (10 to 14 feet long) in the US.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Since the fuel efficiency standards are based on the vehicles footprint, going a few inches bigger allows for a slightly more powerful but also slightly less fuel efficient engine. So the car is roomier, more powerful, and doesn’t get penalized for lower mpg.

          Small trucks are penized for not being fuel efficent enough. I really wish that lead to smaller electric or hybrid trucks like the Maverick, but people have been conviced that those smaller efficient trucks are bad.

          I wish the standards were not based on size, but by vehicle type. Same end result for trucks being popular, but at least smaller trucks would be viable alternatives to sedans again.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Or hell, just base it on straight up fuel efficiency. If there’s a small car that’s already more fuel efficient than everything else on the market, there should be no disincentive to sell more of them, even if that fuel efficiency doesn’t improve over time.

            A larger vehicle is only better if it’s being used to move more people (that would otherwise be using another vehicle). Maybe instead of mpg (miles per gallon) it should be pmpg (person miles per gallon), where it not only depends on the vehicle itself but how many people are expected to ride in it regularly (which the manufacturer can add seats for but is more dependent on the owner).

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Going by seats would encourage the already annoying four door pickup trend since it means every truck needs to be longer to compensate. I mean, wouldn’t a smaller two seater truck that gets better mileage be an improvement over a full size four door truck?

              A small two door pickup that gets mileage close to a similarly sized hatchback would be awesome. But it would be hard to do in the US right now because of mpg standards being tied to size, which are also the reason so many tiny cars are underpowered to squeeze out that last few mpg.

              • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s what I meant about it being more dependent on the owner rather than the number of seats. You can’t tell at the point of sale how many people each buyer is going to be transporting regularly, but it plays a huge role in how efficient that vehicle will ultimately be.

                A four seater truck is horrible if it’s just the owner riding alone in it, but pretty good if it’s full and being driven instead of 4 single occupier trucks.

                Though a 4 seater sedan is even better, so I was referring mostly to higher occupancy vehicles, like vans that can seat 7+. One of those could replace two sedans if filled to capacity. Or a 50 seater bus, or a 300 seater train (or whatever capacity mass transit options have).

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    My dream car: An EV version of the 1955 Nash Metropolitan, seen here in this silly ad photo:

    (Sorry, it’s hard to find pictures that give a true indication of the smallness of the car. Also, mine would be the red and white two tone variety.)

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    Saw a lady driving a truck which its hood was taller than my veloster and all I saw was knuckles. This old lady probably couldn’t even see the road.
    Fuck these people and fuck the companies that make em

    Large trucks like that should be like transports. Ya should have to take a special license course to even be able to own to prove you can drive it. 90% of truck owners can’t so they own the biggest POS to ensure their safety at everyone’s else’s safety.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I see A LOT of older people who can’t see over the dash. I bet they don’t know their seat raises vertically. their eyes line up with the top of the steering wheel, no way they’re paying attention enough to what’s going on beyond 15 feet, much less around them.

    • ghen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      As was designed by the people who actually wrote those laws, the lobbyists. More profitable cars to sell as America moves farther and farther away from reality with car prices.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Bumper height needs to be standardized so they match up properly. One of the biggest safety issues is how modern SUV bumpers don’t align with cars bumper bars.

    • helopigs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe this is the point, but that might cause SUVs to be prohibitively unsafe, because their center of momentum would be so high relative to impact height. For example, if an SUV with one of these low bumpers hit a barrier, it would probably perform a front flip over it 😂

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Let’s target them in order to lower the demand for fossil fuels. The drivers of these vehicles are the ones driving up gas prices; and then subsequently crying about gas prices.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yay we will have the return of small trucks. These behemoths are good for towing and work, but not everyday driving.

    • Shapillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Most of the behemoths aren’t even good as utilitary vehicles…

      I’ve got a 15yo Renault Kangoo which could beat almost any oversized suburban pedestrian flattener in all metrics except price.

    • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I want so much to ditch my Jeep Grand Cherokee for a truck (I drive to work once a week but pull a camper on the weekends), sadly a lot of them might not fit in my 1970’s garage.

  • aloeTGL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s like a negative feedback loop I want an SUV because of a truck or another SUV hit me. I feel like I might be able to survive that but if I’m in my geometro, or a small compact car. I don’t think I’m coming out of that alive if a giant trucker or suv hit me And I know that’s not gonna change. They’re not gonna suddenly recall thousands of oversized pick up trucks those trucks are gonna be on the road for the next 10 to 15 years to come, even if something changes soon. It would take a while to phase them out.

    I just want public high-speed rail everywhere 15 minutes cities please

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    But how will all of these guys compensate for their average or less than average penis?