A former Twitter employee, Gary Rooney, won about $600,000 for unfair dismissal after Twitter assumed he resigned by not responding to Elon Musk’s “hardcore” work email.

The case highlighted the importance of clear communication between employers and employees, especially regarding significant changes in employment terms.

Rooney’s private Slack messages, where he discussed leaving, were used as evidence by Twitter, underscoring that internal communication on platforms like Slack is not always private and can be used in legal disputes.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    internal communication on platforms like Slack is not always private

    That’s common sense, frankly.

    • Paddzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      But people don’t understand it.

      Hell, no email sent or received is yours and likely can never be truly deleted off your company’s exchsnge. Same with files etc.

      It’s not common knowledge, let’s not pretend it is and educate people.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        True that. I have to tell employees regularly to not send any chat or email they don’t want read in court. That usually gets the point across.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      When I worked as a US FedGov contractor, I was greeted with a long warning banner every time I logged into my computer. The tl;dr version of it is “fuck your privacy”. Being that I was part of cybersecurity for the site I was working at, I was one of the people doing the fucking. While we didn’t read everything from everyone all the time, we were logging it and could pull it up, if we were performing an investigation. We also had some automated stuff scanning for patterns and keywords on a regular basis, which could trigger an investigation.

      While I’m no longer in the FedGov space (thank the gods), I still assume that everything I do on my work system or with work accounts is being logged. Also, I’m still working in cybersecurity and am often still the one doing the privacy fucking. Yes, everything is being logged. We may not look at it today, we may not look at it tomorrow. But, when HR and Legal ask us about a user’s activity, we can usually be pretty detailed. Act accordingly.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Fucking good. I’ve had to fire people (up in Canada though) and it’d be fucking ridiculous to “Please opt in to not be fired” it violates so many fucking employment laws.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    8 months ago

    american-based billionaire attempts to use american capitalist tactics against an employee who is not in america. fails spectacularly.

    are workers rights communism now? /s