Does it have something to do with the rise of smartphones and no one typing on real keyboards? (Maybe why blogs died.)

Is it a consequence of voting, which blogs didn’t have?

What happens to your thoughts? Do you turn them all in the form of a question? Do you tear them down into a Mastodon one-liner and hope a popular person notices it?

If Lemmy had more of ourselves in this way, maybe it would be a healthier place.

Being idle until the media put out an article on something for us to talk about gives them too much power over us.

There’s an actual_discussion community, which isn’t exactly lively. There’s a casualconversation community, and even that’s all in the form of a question.

    • connect@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      I expect it would be too much for me alone. And do I put them all in one poorly-named general community that I make that ends up a grab-bag, or do I make lots of communities that I only touch once in six months when I happen to have a thought or experience in some topic and I also happen to remember that I even have that community to write in?

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hello’s right.

        Mastodon, Lemmy, and the Fediverse in general are what you make of it. I want there to be more content, so most days I post an article or two.

        If you want more discussion, do the same, engage with people.

        • connect@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          One large reason I haven’t rushed to start communities is that there are some personality types that live to be a moderator, and some that totally don’t. But I guess you do it and if it reaches the point where you have to moderate and you hate it, someone else must be around who can take it on.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why is Lemmy not a place for thoughts and observations, rather than just links, questions, and memes?

    First off, Lemmy isn’t “a place”, each instance is unique in their own way. You are quite welcome to set up an instance around this concept, it’s not hard.

    • connect@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      And to think in the 90s, there was the belief that the internet was going to free us from corporations (because the corporations were going to be too stupid for cyberspace or the information superhighway, etc.). I’m not sure whether that was young-person naivete or whether it ultimately came from dot-com marketers, but it was around.

    • connect@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      My understanding is that on Mastodon, you keep it pretty short, and that you have to be followed by people by having gotten reposted by the right popular people or no one will ever know you exist. I’m not very comfortable with chasing popularity. And when I looked at Mastodon, it didn’t look very light.

      • johsny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Good point. I have an account there, but I don’t really like or use it, I think for exactly the reasons you mentioned.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    As to your title, who says it isn’t? Just because it isn’t as commonly used that way doesn’t mean it isn’t for that. Also, my understanding is that Lemmy was created as a federated alternative to Reddit, and while I would say that Reddit did have more engagement for general discussion, it was/is probably better known for questions, links, and memes just as you’re seeing on Lemmy.

    What happens to your thoughts? Do you turn them all in the form of a question?

    This next part is just my opinion, but regarding this quote and your title contrasting commentary to questions, in my opinion posts with questions are likely to be more engaging as they give a direct point for responses. If you’re just posting your thoughts and ideas into the void, people are less likely to engage with them unless you are saying something particularly compelling or controversial.

    If Lemmy had more of ourselves in this way, maybe it would be a healthier place.

    Healthier in what way? Size of userbase? Number of posts/comments? Or are you referring to the quality of discourse and level of courtesy or toxicity between users?

    • connect@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I get that a question brings more engagement, but if I don’t have a question, I don’t have a question. And I might have a thought I want to put down in writing, and maybe someone will read it. Even if no one happens to read it, putting it where someone could read it and not just on paper or a nowhere unknown blog can feel better.

      Healthier, maybe less combative from getting a better understanding of who someone is.

  • PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I think its just down to the lack of users, and esspecially lack of creators. There just isn’t many people who care enough about a subject to write multiple paragraphs on it, nonetheless to an audience of half-a-dozen users, who likely also have an extreme aversion to monitization of said content given Lemmy’s culture. For most users, there isn’t even karma to act as an incentive to post.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Our demographics don’t support uncertainty. Most of us are here because we are certain distributed is better than centralized, community run is better than corporate run, FOSS is better than proprietary, etc. The sign-up process discourages casual users, so most users have made up their minds to be here.

    For better or worse, we’re highly opinionated, and we’ve decided some things are bad and others are good. Very few topics are open to discussion because we’ve already decided.

    And if we haven’t decided on something, it’s usually because we’ve decided it doesn’t matter, so we’ll ignore it.

    It isn’t a sustainable community, but I fit in, so I’m still here.

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    When a headline or thread starts with “Why…” you can often reply to it simply by repeating the question without the first word and emphasising the new first word, eg:

    Is Lemmy not a place for thoughts and observations, rather than just links, questions, and memes?

    I’m not sure that’s true as a starting point. So not point trying to answer “why” it might be the case.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    not a place for thoughts and observations

    Because there are (nearly) normal people on lemmy.

    Normal people are lazy, especially when it comes to using the brain for more than 2 seconds in a row.