There’s no hate like Christian love.
What’s even weirder is that they gave the mother 7 consecutive life sentences, but the father who actually impregnated the child only got 1 life sentence + 42 years.
1 life sentence + 42 years.
ok but that is enough. the mom just got Overkill+
They do it that way so even with good behavior or some appeals for a commuted sentence, still ends up being more years than they’ll live by a mile.
It also said that he was charged with the same 6 counts of child neglect though. So either the article was unclear on his actual sentence also being multiple consecutive life sentences or the charges of neglect didn’t all stick for some reason.
I don’t have any specifics but it could be that the father was not in a position to actually be responsible for her care at some point. Maybe the mother kicked him out or something. I’m just speculating, though. No idea really.
It’s simple. In the USA, and many other counties, rape of any sort by a man isn’t as bad as anything a woman/mother might do wrong. I didn’t read the article however I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that the husband was also beating, raping or otherwise abusing his wife.
You are clearly quite ignorant of the actual statistics when it comes to gender disparities in sentencing for the same crimes.
What even is a life sentence
It’s mostly what it sounds like. Prison until you die. But, unless given a life sentence without the possibility of parole, once you’ve served a minimum number of years (and that number varies on the crime, state/federal law and judge’s applied minimums) you can become eligible for parole. What that means is a parole board can determine later that you have sufficiently served time for your crimes, that you are remorseful for them, and that you no longer pose a danger to anyone, and release you from prison before your death.
When it comes to sentences with specific years attached, like this guy’s 42 year sentence, it is a bit different. They can also end early with a parole decision, but there is a minimum time served for each sentence before you are eligible for parole. That minimum scales with the full sentence. It is, I think, usually 1/3rd of the full sentence, unless the judge sets a higher minimum.
Also you can be given multiple years long sentences, one per guilty verdict, but depending on the judge’s discretion or if those crimes are statuarily required to be served consecutively (i.e. one after the other), sometimes those sentences are to be served concurrently (i.e. at the same time). What that means is, if you get sentenced to two 1 year sentences and a 3 year sentence to be served concurrently, you’re really only serving 3 years. But if you have to serve them consecutively, you’ll be serving all 5 years in total. And your parole potential starts, thus, later.
So it’s kind of complicated. Sometimes you see someone getting a life sentence and they’re released in 20 years. Sometimes you see someone get a dozen sentences but they’re all served concurrently and they’re out in a few years too. Sometimes someone gets multiple sentences to be served consecutively and ends up with like 200 years in prison and are essentially guaranteed to die in prison before they are eligible for parole, despite none of their crimes carrying a life sentence potential.
Also this dude’s 42 years and life sentence are consecutive, so he must serve the minimum of both before possibility of parole. But that is probably about 35-40 years from now at minimum. I’m unclear if the mother’s 7 life sentences are consecutive or concurrent, but since they didn’t say, probably concurrent.
Thanks for all that explanation. It ended up in me being even more confused what the point of 7 concurrent life sentences is.
Sentences are concurrent by default unless the specific law they are convicted of breaking requires their sentence to be served consecutively or the judge specifically rules that they are to be consecutive. I am not really sure on the history of why that is though.
From a technical standpoint, getting multiple life sentences means if one gets removed on appeal, the others still stand.
For the victim(s), especially if there’s multiple victims, each life sentence acknowledges each crime committed against them and validates them.
The last I checked a *life sentence " was 40 or 45years. So if they claim 2 life sentences that technically 80-90 years in jail.
Things I wish I could unread.
I hear people say Oklahoma is the most free state in the union, and yet they won’t let you rape your own child and force her to give birth? That’s not the America my ancestors had nothing to do with building.
A 34-year-old Oklahoma mother will spend the rest of her life behind bars for allowing her husband to impregnate her 11-year-old daughter, then forcing the child to give birth at home without any medical care.
i thought the post title was bad enough… but daaaaaaamn. they sure do go the extra mile.
What the actual fuck
In-fucking-deed.
“Brotherson” is a word I had never expected to learn, and in retrospect one I had hoped to never know.
Edit: The article is vague, so I suppose “sisterdaughter” is another word I can add to the list of words I don’t want to think about.
I wonder if the authors in the USA in around 20 years or so will be casually mentioning brothersons like it’s perfectly normal.
It’s probably more likely he was a stepfather. The article is very ambiguous
Yep, the news from the Oklahoma Oblast no longer surprises me. Certainly the Orange Pedo Shitstain will pardon the sick bastards because that is why he is mentioned over 38,000 times in a certain set of files.
Certainly the Orange Pedo Shitstain will pardon the sick bastards
He doesn’t have pardon power over state charges. But, it is Oklahoma. So, Republican governor Kevin Stitt will still probably give it. After all, the Republican position seems to be that abusing children is a good thing.
Ain’t none of them giving pardons out for free.
This entire article and some clarifications in the comments make me feel sick. This entire story is fucked up and i wish I hadn’t read it. Poor child is traumatised for life
Thank you for this warning.
Someone once wrote a comment on the internet which i read, which said something like, " when you have a choice to look at something traumatic or not, you don’t have to look. "
Sadder still, society will expect her get over it and carry on. Society doesn’t understand that there’s no “normal” for her any more.
Hopefully she can get a lot of help and therapy while she’s still young. Once you’re an adult no one gives a fuck what you’ve been through or what you’re going through.
The bills won’t pay themselves. Food won’t magically show up just because you’re too mentally or emotionally fucked up to function like a normal adult.
It’s Oklahoma, the therapist will probably just tell her to pray for forgiveness from her sins.🙄
That or they’ll blame her for “seducing” her father.
Oh gosh oh gee, I wonder who they voted for?
Really? Come on. That’s quite a stretch you’re making here - really grasping at straws to assume they might have voted for anyone other than Trump. The nerve.
Had me in the first half…
No it can be just non political where the republican is too moderate so they don’t vote or only vote for a random third party. There are plenty of hard right people that don’t vote especially in deep red or non competitive areas.
Historically maybe. But Trump and his cronies made sure that only the most hard right extremists are on the ballot for the Republicans
Well this is just obviouslywrong
Such a difference between this and Epstein, while the subject of sexual abuse of minors is roughly the same. I guess the lesson is, if you’re gonna rape and pillage, first be filthy rich.
That’s a dad who spent way too much time “thinking about the children”
Jesus Christ Oklahoma
Mom goes to jail, father gets a seat in Trump’s cabinet.
I have a 12 year old. Wtf is wrong with people
So the husband gets one life sentence for doing it, and the wife gets seven life sentences for allowing it?
They both deserve life in prison, but why did the actual perpetrator get a lesser sentence?
I assume its what they could prove. Dad raped kid obvious guilt provable by paternity test if any question. Proving neglect was probably harder if daughter was in mom’s care mostly.
So this child rapist gets life in prison, but the one doing it at scale gets… the Presidency.








