• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Character.AI discovered the one conversation its bots couldn’t keep going: the one with its accountants. $56 million in compute costs in eight months, and the monetization strategy was apparently: hope the next investor is even lonelier than our users. Silicon Valley keeps confusing engagement with a business model.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      If LLMs can’t be made more power efficient, then the technology isn’t ready yet for general use. There may have to be fundamental engineering breakthroughs before what these systems do can be more than a very expensive and inefficient worldwide proof of concept.

      Of course, the military and the surveillance industry will still want to keep it, even if no one else can afford it, and we’ll be the ones paying for it.

      • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        If LLMs can’t be made more power efficient, then the technology isn’t ready yet for general use.

        Hm, I don’t see the harm in powering local models with solar.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Well that is an alternative. But I bet each query to a local 27b model takes less energy anyway than the same query to Claude Opus or Fable in some data centre. So it is also a case of improving energy efficiency by running smaller models.