share on other platforms.
Do the creators realize the safe site address is on here 1 time in small font, while the unsafe address is on here 6 times in big font? The good site should be equal size, and I’d put the info about IDF under that, not in one block.
typically I would agree with you. this is a poster to bring awareness to information that has already been published from votesafe. the key is, “votesafe is not safe”.
Agreed. But that’s on there 6 times. One LDF.vote at equal size, but separated in a different color or italicized would be better heirarchy, and be more clear and keep that repetition idea intact. And then the explainer can be split up, so the good part is also emphasized more, under the good address.
At the moment every piece of the good info is buried.
Edit: I did a quick mock up. If were making this flyer, this is about what I’d do. This way it’s clear what LDF is, exactly where to go, and some inspirational messaging sort of from their site, for good measure.
Or you could even do this:
That, but maybe make LDF.vote green instead of red?
I think the most important information is clear. I don’t think they care about driving traffic to their site, just about protecting voters.
also, why did you link idf instead of LDF?
you realize idf is Israeli Defense Force, right?
Back in the day this would be illegal.
technically still is, just the law isn’t being enforced unilaterally.
Can we bombard it with useless or counter data?
probably worth a shot. do it from a secure line though.
I’m sure they’ll use it as a way to charge people with trying to interfere with elections.
Oh, right. I forgot I wasn’t a billionaire for a second.
If opp can’t know where to sign up to vote and feel safe to do so, many won’t be able to vote. Hide the solution in a sea of bad solutions and it doesn’t matter that it exists, you’ve effectively disabled the real solution.
These are the games of power we’re being attacked with.
There’s this lady who does a lot of original reporting tracking down receipts and findong website data to prove stuff like this:
Rules 1 and 2, OP.
Between this and that cancer scam, they’re absolutely not responsible enough for non profits
