• dotAlexX@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    One day these companies will take everything away from someone who has nothing to lose. Remember killdozer, “Sometimes reasonable men must do unreasonable things”.

  • GrumpyCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Cannot wait for this AI bubble to pop as these corrupt politicians are so obviously doing this at our expense, while they pocket all the profit

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Here’s the thing. The bubble will pop, people will loose billions, the prices of everything will go into flux, the economy will crash, and the people who still have enough money to make serious investments during that time will be able to buy so much more stuff simply because so much more will be for sale.

      We saw it happen in 2008, we saw it happen in 2020, and it will happen again when the bubble pops, and we’ll just let the people who crashed the economy off the hook, and borrow more money from our future selves to pay them to fix it now.

      • GrumpyCreature@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        well that doesn’t sound as good, i never even considered this to be a possibility, but thinking about it logically makes sense

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Happens every time. Realistically, the only thing that would “level” the playing field is a complete collapse of all currency. Unrealistically, it could be leveled through progressive taxes on obscene incomes, a recurring tax of accumulated wealth over a certain value, and closing of tax loopholes.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Don’t forget how many good people will be left holding the bag due to their retirement funds being drained into that bubble while the elites cash out :( just like the 2008 crash this is just another pump and dump at our expense while the rich will make out like the robber Barron’s they are anyways

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I keep seeing this story all over my news feeds and YouTube recommendations. Glad it’s being put out there, at least!

  • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just saw a video from a local news channel about a different patch of land in Georgia where Georgia Power was given an easement across a bunch of people’s land, essentially cutting these people’s property in half, then they clear cut the forest at the back of their properties and installed some giant transmission line towers also to power datacenters. One young couple interviewed had just bought their property and were planning on using the land to grow food but now they can’t and they also can’t sell because only half their property is usable despite them having paid for the entire plot.

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s sort of the risk you take when buying a property with an easement though. Their realtor should have disclosed that.

      If it wasn’t there when they bought it the utility company should have had to at least pay market value for the land.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I think in this case they are actually using eminent domain for it.

        Basically they are reaching out to families, asking for permission, and then when denied that permission going through the state/town and getting permission that way.

        The easement taking up half their land was the “compromise” that the utility company gave them, because they already had a notice/permission from the town/state on the entire property. They were going to have the line no matter what, it was whether the current owners wanting to have part of the property, or none of the property. its pretty sickening.

  • Ekybio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember that feelings of compassion should be contingent on the question: “Who do you vote for?”

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s deranged to create a class of people that it’s okay to steal houses from and pollute the place they live no matter how they voted, actually

      • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s wrong to steal people’s houses and to pollute the place they live, no matter who they voted for.

        But I’ll be damned if I shed a single tear if these people happily voted in the regime which brazenly supports stealing people’s houses and polluting where they live.

        • moustachio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          You can still empathize with people who were uninformed and subsequently exploited / harmed.

          Giving into the “me vs them” team mentality is giving the oligarchs exactly what they want: divide and conquer.

          • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            They were informed. They were warned. They were told about “project 2025” and how bad it would be. They’ve been through one trump presidency. They knew what they signed up for.

            My stance on trump voters:

            If you voted for him the first time, you made a foolish/uninformed decision. But forgivable.

            If you voted for him the second time, you’re a dumb person and I don’t trust you.

            If you voted for him this third time, after the insurrection, after how horrible he has proven to be, fuck you. You’re evil. No pity from me.

      • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Having a lack of compassion towards someone who voted for this getting their face eaten by leopards is not the same as approval of what’s happening. Are you able to discern the difference?

    • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I doubt who you voted for would have stopped this. AI is the new .com / housing bubble that every big company has to jump on board for.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        On a federal basis, you are likely correct. On a local basis, I highly disagree. Many politicians in areas that are left-leaning are putting in place data center bans. Local elections matter.

  • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    When reached for comment the family said, “how could this happen to us? We’re not even trans?”

    Have the day you voted for, know that you won’t be the last people in rural areas that this happens to, and that when the AI bubble pops you still won’t get the land back. It’s gone forever.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      There is absolutely nothing in the article to indicate the family’s political leanings or how they voted.