What can be done to prevent more dangerous heatwaves in Europe?

Does Europe need to plant more trees in it’s cities?

It appears that Europe does many things right for sustainability and climate change - public transit over cars, recycling, reducing carbon footprint better compared to other parts of the world. Of course all communities can do better at reducing their carbon footprint - Is this America’s fault with their carbon footprint that Europe is suffering? America has their cars, and simply cranks up their Air conditioners when it’s hot.

What else is there to do? I thought China had success improving their renewable energy output, even though they are still polluters, is it the actions of China and the USA causing misery in Europe? How do we help Europeans suffering and prevent this from happening again?

  • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 天前

    End all fossil fuel use asap and make trade blocks that prefer countries that do the same. Tarrifs for those that use dirty fuels beyond the Eurobloc’s schedule.

    Remember, even if we stopped today, there is a 20 year lag time so it’s getting way, way worse.

    https://www.iea.org/energy-system/fossil-fuels#tracking

    We are still growing fossil fuel use. The repercussions are enormous, and effectively, permanent.

    • YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 天前

      At this point we need to spend all of our effort in advancing ways we can pull carbon out of the atmosphere and ocean, we are fucked unless we find an efficient way to do so.

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 天前

    nothing, nothing we do now will stop the warming. if we end all fossil fuel burning, concrete production, and livestock production tomorrow, the atmosphere will continue to warm for hundreds of years before peaking. We are cooked. Grab your popcorn.

    • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 天前

      This. What part of “well past the tipping point” do people not understand? The time to take drastic action was 20 years ago. It’s “adapt or die” time. The good news is, the elderly are more vulnerable so that should help with the population decline issue.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 天前

      Sorry. But this comment made me think of this:

      Anyway? We’re fucked and the game now is to mitigate and adapt.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 天前

      👆

      Also, it would be helpful not to worsen it with some hype, currently AI or to let go of old fossil technology. But there we go.

  • zlatiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 天前

    Methinks this needs policy-level changes. There’s only so much we can do individually at this point

    Immediate terms: There’s nothing that can be done to curb the heatwave IMO, but there are ways to prevent danger. Namely, AC, cooling centers, public education on preventing heat-related injuries/deaths… Maybe govts can even temporarily reduce regulations/give subsidies on split-systems to help nudge some folks, but nothing much else can be done. One pet-idea I have is cooling centers, since I know Houston (which has extreme weathers) opens cooling/warming centers when the weather is too extreme; it is a very progressive implementation that benefits those who are underprivileged

    Slightly longer term: Trees/green spaces always help. Public transit systems always help. Some fairly sweeping changes in climate-related regulation (ease AC regulations, tighten car regulations, tax on pollution, etc), aimed at both reducing danger and improving the climate… or at least recuperate some “pollution tax” so the govt can use the money to plant more trees and build more trains. Also some European countries can do so much better at discouraging car use (or at least switch to EVs) given how good the train networks are; for countries without good train networks, build some

    Even longer term: Massive investments in green energy; if they are investing already, invest more. But be practical… temporary solutions like nuclear are not everyone’s cup of tea but they help with the transition. Do better on international collaboration. Find ways to discourage international trading partners from over-polluting (probably a combination of tariffs and negotiations… not my specialty).

    Obligatory not an economist/political scientist, there are probably better ways to implement these than what I suggested

    • robocall@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 天前

      What if the reflective screen is angled towards another planet and signs of life appear?!

      • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 天前

        I was thinking aiming it back at the sun to give it a taste of its own medicine but your idea works as well.

  • Fleppensteyn@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 天前

    More green wouldn’t hurt. The city I live in invested heavily in removing green space. Shrubs and plants are nearly all removed and the remaining empty grass fields are continuously cut. Having green space cools the city down, gives shade and helps animals, so how about we plant things and stop cutting everything?

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 天前

      In the USA, we cover everything we can with black asphalt, and those expansive parking lots means you can’t walk anywhere.

      The interesting question for the US is “can we be doing anÿhing to make things worse than we already are?”

  • Abyssian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 天前

    The idea we seem to be going with is that we could kill everyone in Europe who isn’t extremely wealthy. Then there will be no one in that region in danger from climate change, and far less pollution globally.

  • DudeWhoYapsTooMuch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 天前

    They’re going have to actually focus on Green based energy instead of relying to America and China and many more other countries to do so.