California Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a law requiring K-12 schools to provide gender-neutral bathrooms by July 2026.

The new law, Senate Bill 760, was among a series of laws signed by Newsom Saturday to expand protections for the state’s LGBTQ community.

“California is proud to have some of the most robust laws in the nation when it comes to protecting and supporting our LGBTQ+ community,” Newsom said in a statement.

Under the law, “each school district, county office of education, and charter school” would be required to have at least one gender-neutral bathroom on campus on or before July 1, 2026. The bathroom must be available for use during school hours and during school functions when students are present, the law states.

  • Octavio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I went to a gender neutral restroom in California a couple months ago. Each toilet was in its own little private room, and there was a common area of sinks for hand washing. My only thought was that all public restrooms should be like that. Even apart from the equal access issue for LGBTQ+ people, why make one gender stand in line when there are unused facilities right next door.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      My only thought was that all public restrooms should be like that.

      Agrreed. Sadly, “arrow doesn’t turn”.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 years ago

        So are most gender neutral bathrooms at businesses. I bet most of the conservatives don’t care if they are, and if asked would still oppose them on principle (even if they don’t actually notice when they use them at businesses)

    • Kage520@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      My biggest reason for wanting separate bathrooms is the propensity for women to squat and spray the seat. I know guys can make a mess too but usually the women’s restroom is dirtier than men’s. Also women’s restroom is more likely to have a line.

      But I’m sure building-wise it would be easier to just make one big bathroom so it should probably be that way, long as it’s big enough.

    • Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You mean you don’t have signs up in your house for your guests to direct them to entirely different bathrooms?

    • cricket97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      because females don’t like going to the bathroom around men? Not really hard to understand

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yah, this is not the men making this an issue. I couldn’t give a fuck if woman walks into the mens room, I’m here pissing and I’m not going to worry about anyone looking. Gods help you if it went the other way, you’d end up on a list.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      only if they’re single-occupant bathrooms. which. for schools… are usually not going to be the case. personally, that should be the solution. just rip out both bathrooms, install single occupant cells. nobody cares what you are. the only sign needed is an ‘occupied’/‘vacant’ on the latch.

      (edit: well, you’d still have to have a placard with braille on it so blind people can know what kind of room it is.)

  • Rayspekt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    So there will stil be regular male/female toilets? In the end I’m kinda whatever about this as long as it’s not used as an excuse to remove urinals.

    • Old_Dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes, every gender neutral bathroom I’ve seen here at elementary schools and college campuses have single occupancy gender neutral bathroom/s next to the men’s and women’s bathrooms.

    • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I haven’t read the text of the law, but unless it explicitly says otherwise, I suspect it will be up to the schools/districts. If they have the money and room to build separate non-gendered bathrooms, then some of them will do so. But I suspect that most will simply convert existing bathrooms and not have gender specific bathrooms at all.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Every gender neutral bathroom I’ve been in has removed the urinals. It’s fucking annoying.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Animal Shit House”

      You are correct, humans are not plants, fungi, bacterias or viruses, but what about colorful ponies? Our toilets are unlikely to fit them.

      • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        “animal shit house” does not necessarily imply that multiple types of animal use it

        Humans are animals, we use the shit house, therefore it is an animal shit house

  • zanzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    it’s heartening that the governor has been working so hard to solve the state’s crippling housing crisis…oh wait…what?