Running AI is so expensive that Amazon will probably charge you to use Alexa in future, says outgoing exec::In an interview with Bloomberg, Dave Limp said that he “absolutely” believes that Amazon will soon start charging a subscription fee for Alexa

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 years ago

    We need to move AI from the cloud to our own hardware running in our homes. Free, open source, privacy focused hardware. It’ll eventually be very affordable.

    • pyldriver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      God I wish, I would just love local voice control to turn my lights and such on and off… but noooooooooooo

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I do wonder how much of those voice assistants could run on-device. Most of what I use Bixby for (I know. I KNOW.) is setting timers. I think simple things like that can run entirely on the phone. It’s got a shocking amount of processing in it.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      While you may have points against Apple and how effective Siri may be, with this latest version kind of products, even the watch has enough processing power to do voice processing on device. No ads. No cloud services

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 years ago

    AI is being touted as the solution to everything these days. It’s really not, and we are going to find that out the hard way.

    • Hoomod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      If IBM actually manages to convert COBOL into Java like they’re advertising, they’ll end up killing their own cash cow

      So much still runs on COBOL

  • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    Alexa is more like a telemarketer disguised as an assistant. Every interaction is followed by a “by the way . Its a shit experience so I stopped using mine.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 years ago

      Alexa was designed explicitly for that purpose. They lose money on every Echo sold, the whole idea was they would make money selling you stuff. Turns out people would rather use their Echo to check the weather, get recipes, etc. rather than voice shop.

      • hightrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        I just can’t see a use case for voice shopping. There are almost zero instances where I want to buy something without having a visual of that thing in front of me at time of purchase.

        I could possibly see something like “buy another stick of deodorant”, but even then I want to see if there are deals or some other options and would want to check the price at a minimum.

        Seems like yet another MBA idea.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ha, I use mine almost exclusively as a light switch. I don’t have to get out of bed to turn off my lights or turn on my fan. I’m sure they’re losing a bunch of money on me

        • maniclucky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s a great lightswitch. Also, thermostat adjustor (my husband is very particular and changes it about a dozen times a day).

    • o0oradaro0o@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Setting all my Alexa’s to UK English got rid of all marketing “by the ways.” I still regret going with the Alexa ecosystem but at least for now there is a workaround for the most rage inducing part of it.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    So they expect that people pay for being spied upon and seriously data mined?

    • ViewSonik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yep, used to be much better. There was SO much potential with it too. I wish there was a Smart Speaker with integration into ChatGPT. Id love to stand in the shower and ask it shit

      • deranger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You can do this with a Siri shortcut.

        It still falls short because LLMs aren’t smart, they’re just approximately not wrong most of the time. I thought it would be a lot cooler than it actually is.

    • DarienGS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      From the article:

      Amazon has bet big on AI, with the company unveiling a new, AI-powered version of Alexa alongside updated versions of its Echo Frames and Carrera smart glasses last week.

  • OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Good luck, I guess? Got the first Google home, at first it was great, I was asking it tons of questions. Then the questions stopped, used it for turning on the lights and other automations. Then I installed Home Assistant and the only command Google Home got was to set a timer to know when to pull things out of the oven. Eventually I stopped doing that.

    At the moment all Google/Nest Homes have their mic cut off, I only use them to stream music in my house from my NAS via Plex. So yeah…

  • JuniorsCrackDealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ok. I’ll be the weirdo. If it’s actually useful, I would pay for it.

    Not if it’s just the parlor trick that it currently is.

    • theragu40@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is the killer for all this shit right now as far as I’m concerned. All of it lives squarely in “huh…neat” territory. I have yet to see anything I felt was truly necessary. Until that happens, paying is a non starter for me.

  • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    I use Alexa as a way to use an old speaker system. I wouldn’t pay to use any “smart” speaker systems. They are pretty dumb and I’ve already paid once

  • Random_user@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    All I want alexa to do is turn my lights on and off, set timers, and show me my own pictures. And it can BARELY do that without fucking it up. Everyone I know wants the same, they expect nothing more from it. “AI” features of Alexa aren’t t needed or wanted by anyone I’ve talked to about it.

  • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    They thought people would be like “Alexa, but me a ton of shit on Amazon” but people just use it for timers and the weather