Twenty years ago, I met a couple with a young son who decided not to let the kid have sugar. I wonder how that might have worked out for the kid now that he’s grown.

I assume the kid hit 18 and went on a sugar binge as soon as he tasted it the first time.

Anyone have experience with this?

  • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    They didn’t address my point at all and went for the extreme opposite. As if it was a gotcha.

    • cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The world must look so small and scary from your perspective if you think this was opposition to you. Its not.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Nah man, I just dislike when people do shit like he did thinking they have a point.

        Also nice knee jerk reaction.

        Edit: in what world is a counterpoint agreement?

        • cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          This is so frustrating

          The commenter was building on top of your argument

          You said prohibition wasnt healthy

          They said total absence of control wasnt healthy

          They implicitly agreed with you that prohibition wasnt healthy

          I then spell it out for you that the message being built, that almost certainly you also agree with, is that moderation is the answer.


          A counterpoint turns a random point into a line, a line into a polygon, a polygon into a solid, etc.

          That counterpoint gave your message an extra and important dimmension. They thought your message was correct but lacking neccisary nuance.

          For some reason you got peeved with that, and i think that looks poorly on you, not anyone else.

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Counterpoints aren’t agreement

            Edit: No 3 paragraph retort? @cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world

            • cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Dont be a troll, this is pathetic.

              Come back to this tomorrow and reread it if you have to.

              I’m done, heres your three paragraphs though, i still love you.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      One of the things that makes me ignore my mastodon account is how quickly people take offence there, even going so far as to try to shut down conversation threads on their posts as though they don’t expect any depth or variant viewpoints. While there are lots of “reply guy” types over there, even the hint of disagreement, perceived or real, is seen as objectionable.

      This response is similar.