im personally excited for it.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve written a couple.

    My job requires a lot of troubleshooting, almost to the point of reverse engineering. I’ve spent many hours reading and getting through logs.

    Now I have an agent who can one-shot stuff half of the time, and n-shot the 4/5 other times. And it learns from experience.

    I enjoyed experimenting with it, and now it’s a timesaver for my team.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t even like giving deterministic software access to my system. Now imagine all the bad things that can happen when you give access to non-deterministic software.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Laugh as business spend billions on software that doesn’t work. Cry as those same businesses fire staff to cover the cost of broken software.

    Like, they can’t even run pass maths tests or run a vending machine business. How do you expect one or a suite of them to manage your product lifecycle?

    • steam@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      openai for example claims chatgpt can perform close to or above phd level math. so your claim about it not passing math tests isn’t really correct.

      • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        so your claim about it not passing math tests isn’t really correct.

        You base this statement on claims from the company that’s trying to sell the product. Maybe try to make chatgpt do some sums first before believing these claims.

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        openai for example claims

        Claiming something doesn’t make it true. If it were true. It wouldn’t be a claim it would be a statement of fact which is directly opposed to the point of marketing.

        Seeing as you don’t support your claim that it can do permanent head damage maths, I will support my statement of they suck at maths.

        https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/02/26/ai-models-suck-slightly-less-at-math-than-they-did-last-year/5191967

      • brynden_rivers_esq@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        lol, sorry…the company selling a product made an outlandish claim and you believe it? I got a bridge to sell you!

        I think the fundamental problem is that you haven’t actually used these tools enough to see that the companies peddling them are snake oil salesmen. Nothing they say is true, they’re completely full of shit, and they’re terrified they’re not going to make any of the money they promised their investors they would make.

        And like…if you think about it for a moment it would make sense, given how these tools work, that they can’t do much in the way of reasoning. They just get better and better at replicating the language they’re supposed to mimic, which sometimes even carries the right content! Wow! But that’s only a secondary effect, right?