• gdog05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    I think I’ve made this comment elsewhere but Krull, Enemy Mine, and Last Starfighter are the top of my list for an effects refresh.

    There’s also no reason why a decent Eragon movie couldn’t be made.

  • JennyLaFae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Instead of the corporatization of storytelling, we should be letting artists tell the stories they want to tell. We should engage with our media more critically and stop chasing nostalgia.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The best example is The Thing. The original film in the 1950s was awkward af. But the 1980s remake by John Carpenter was chef’s kiss. Then they made a remake of a remake and it was meh.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The 2011 The Thing wasn’t so much a remake as it was a prequel to the remake, telling the story from the Norwegian scientists’ camp.

      The 1982 John Carpenter remake opened with the last two remaining Norwegian scientists chasing “The Thing” until it reaches the Americans’ camp. But they’re misunderstood by the Americans. When trying to shoot at The Thing, which has taken the shape of a sled dog, the Americans instead return fire and kill them. Then the Americans explore the Norwegian camp and try to figure out what horrors killed everyone there, while slowly discovering why they were shooting at a dog in the first place.

      The 2011 film shows what happened to the Norwegians before the 1982 remake. You’re correct, it wasn’t as great of a film (hard to compete with John Carpenter), but it wasn’t exactly a remake.

    • tahoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You scared me for a second, being only aware of the 80s one I thought you wanted a remake of that lol

  • pigup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Because nobody will fund a huge production that’s based on something that didn’t do well. Are you nuts? Are you going to go up to people and ask for 50 million dollars or whatever and say we’re going to take this thing sucked that nobody liked and we’re going to redo it.

    • ttyybb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I mean, they’ve made how many Percy Jackson movies? Pretty sure no one likes any of them.

  • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I only know about that in the case where the film was bad, but based on an great book. The Lord of the Rings and Dune both had bad films made of it.

  • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Let’s have multiple reboots going at the same time. I think it would be great to have like three reboots of Jurassic Park going at the same time with different directors. I want to see a full length Wes Anderson take on the film, but also a Zach Snyder take and maybe a Danny Boyle take competing on the same weekend.

  • Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    On a vaguely related note, why aren’t we making more movies that take a Shakespeare plot and just stuff it in a different setting without trying to hide it? Like 10 Things I Hate about you was Taming of the Shrew.

    Tell me you wouldn’t watch Mechbeth.

      • cobysev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        The Lion King (1994) is Hamlet.

        “O” (2001) is Othello.

        Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead (1990) is based on two minor characters of Hamlet.

        She’s the Man (2006) is Twelfth Night.

        Romeo + Juliet (1996) is a modern-day Romeo and Juliet.

        O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000) is Homer’s Odyssey. Not Shakespeare, but a brilliant modern retelling of one of humanity’s oldest surviving stories. In the same vein as the above mentioned films.

        These are all I can think of off the top of my head. Not to mention dozens of modern Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, and Macbeth retellings over the years. Those three alone are the more popular Shakespeare stories for reinvention on the big screen.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I kinda think Event Horizon had a phenomenal concept, but had a C+ execution. If there’s a movie I think needs a remake, it’s that.

  • Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They knew how to do this in the 80s. Little Shop of Horrors, The Fly, and The Thing for example. All remakes that far surpassed the cheesy originals.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What about remaking foreign movies into domestic interpretations? La Pacte des loups could use an update.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Well, there was the “We want to keep the rights” movie from the… 90s, I think? Then the two with Jessica Alba, then Fantfourstick, then the MCU version. So, yeah, five by my count.