• WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I think we need to accept that humans really just don’t want (many) kids, and that the so-called ‘urge to procreate’ is really just the ‘urge to have sex’ - and unlike 500 years ago they are no longer the same thing. We can choose to have all the sex we want without becoming pregnant. That is what people want, and it has nothing to do with affordability.

    Sure, money might be one factor of many for some people, but if money was really the main issue, then rich countries would have a higher fertility rate, right? Rich people would have more kids, right? Well, the opposite is true. People getting richer, more educated, having better access to healthcare, and last but not least: women obtaining more rights… All of this has made it so people have fewer children. Are we really going to keep deluding ourselves and write it all off as a financial issue? People nowadays are not poorer than in the past. All throughout history poor people have been having kids. It’s just that now they have a choice. And they choose not to.

    tl;dr I think what has changed is that people (read: women) have a choice now and they simply choose not to have (as many) kids.

    • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      You’re absolutely right

      There’s a reason why decreased “fertility” is correlated with women becoming more educated, not men

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The cost of living is too high. Having children is really expensive and you have to worry about whether they’ll make it as adults or whether things will be even worse then

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      This, 1000%. Every study I’ve looked at states the current economy makes having children more of a drain than a gain.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 days ago

    My take is “How can I afford to have a kid when I can’t even take care of myself?”.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Late stage capitalism.

    When it is already hard to save up and buy a house before it’s too late for you and your partner to be capable of conceiving, is it any surprise?

    I know plenty of people who would have a kid but don’t because they simply can’t afford to

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    Other activities outcompete children.

    The other points like difficulty and money are valid but I think primarily kids are just not worth it for many and they’d rather travel or just have their own time which imo should be a perfectly acceptable take.

    That’s for the first child but once you got one the barrier for more is almost always finance or pregnancy difficulties. Kids don’t scale as well as they used to.

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    We’re like pandas in captivity. We’ll fuck if the conditions are right. They haven’t been right in a loooooong time. A little bit of enrichment in our enclosures would help tremendously.

  • DankDingleberry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 days ago

    i personally am afraid that my child would live through a terrible future. also: i just dont feel like it. so maybe the existential anciety is more subconcious? idk

  • Dryad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Anecdotally, I’d say money and the world would be the two big things.

    People don’t have enough money to raise kids. Americans can’t afford to give birth with hospital bills. Childcare is expensive, but the alternative is no income. People can’t accumulate generational wealth, so there’s nothing to pass on, therefore no need for anyone to pass it to.

    Environmental anxiety is real. Why bring kids into a world that’s about to burn?

    Maybe one last factor is rebellion. A small sample I feel like chooses not to have kids so as not to perpetuate the system. The billionaires can’t exploit my kids if I don’t have any.

    • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t think you’re wrong, but poor people never being able to have children would certainly be… Problematic. My forefathers were by no means well off, but having children was (and in many countries still is) seen as way to ensure your own health and safety as you grow older. Sadly, our society is no longer designed for families to thrive. Instead we work for others so we can pay people to look after our loved ones. It’s pretty fucked up when you think about it.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I, too, think all people should be able to raise kids. That society makes it practically impossible is the problem.

        You might call me old-fashioned, but being able to have one person at home to care for the kids and actually raise them is something that I consider a cornerstone.

        Why put kids in the world, just to have to provide for them and have other people raise them, because you cannot afford to do this yourself?

        • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s one of the great scams that industry pulled off - deriding staying home with a family as somehow failing and getting both parents out to the grind. Then selling it as progressive. I’m in favour of equal opportunity in the workplace, but we’ve been left with the worst of both worlds.

  • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Everything is so god damn expensive. And it gets worse every single day.

    Don’t worry though, no country is really worried about it yet because if they were they would work on making things not so obscenely fucking ridiculously expensive. (Although knowing rich bastards they’d probably just let humanity die out before they lost 5¢ on every sale)

    Or at least give some sort if credit to you to lift the burden a bit. I think maybe South Korea is doing this and some Nordic countries and even China too I believe.

    But still, if you have to get the calculator out and figure out how many meals you need to skip this month to be able to pay your bills I think having sex is the last thing on your mind.

    Shit, most people probably ran their mates off already from the insane, soul crushing, non stop fucking stress that being able to never get ahead in your entire life brings. Bonus points if you already had a child with them, now you get to have 25% if your income stolen from you for the next 18 years (25 if they go to college) even if you see them more than they do in a lot of instances. That will sure get you in the mood.

    And if not its still hard to want to fuck when you’re hungry or when you’re constantly about to lose it all and barely hanging on by a thread and obsessing about that reality in your head every single second of every single day.

    TLDR: shit is too god damn expensive and it just keeps getting worse with absolutely no end in sight.