• I disapprove.

      This leads to strategic voting…

      Like… if you really want Bernie to be president but also really hates the far right candidate…, do you appove of… um… Biden or no?

      Okay say you got 55 Democrats and 45 Republican

      Assuming all republicans are all behind one candidate

      You have 30 dems in favor of Biden; 25 in favor of Bernie

      Election day:

      Bernie: 53 approvals, 28 approvals from Biden voters
      Biden: 52 approvals, 22 approvals from bernie voters
      GOP Candidate: 45 approvals

      Somewhere two Biden voter who approved Bernie is gonna be like “man, if we just disapproved Bernie, Biden would’ve won!”

      so then next election

      Bernie: 51 approval
      Biden: 52 approval

      This cycle continues till eventually GOP Candidate gets elected…

      So its a matter of if the Left Progressive or the Corporate Dems chicken out first, and meanwhile the GOP Candidate is gonna win while you fight each other…

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago
        1. strategic voting is impossible to avoid, so it doesn’t really matter and shouldn’t be a consideration.

        2. This cycle continues till eventually GOP Candidate gets elected

        This is a big leap from just saying that some strategic voting will occur. I don’t think you’ve demonstrated this in your example.

        1. This example also still assumes 2 parties. Part of election reform would be to destroy the barriers preventing 3rd parties from running and gaining seats through proportional representation

        2. Ultimately, I want the political apparatus to be destroyed and replaced by an anarchist society. This is the best of the worst in my eyes.