• Sineljora@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Other countries are actually investigating them, and there have been recent consequences in other countries for the current releases.

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The amount of people saying it’s because other world leaders and businessmen are implicit are idiots.

    Not because that can’t be the case. But because it has nothing to do with how this works.

    There is no legal basis anywhere for such a demand. Even if you can prove that one of the victims is from your country. That doesn’t give you the right to access their investigation. It doesn’t give you the right to conduct an investigation inside a forgein country.

    You can make a request. They might say yes, they might say no. But that’s all you can do. Demands are different from requests. Demands have an implicit “or else” attached. It’s not something you throw around lightly.

    one: because it makes you look weak, and two: you need to be able to back it up if they refuse. EU is not going to start another round of trade-war with the US over their child trafficking ring. It’s not our problem. It’s theirs.

  • morphballganon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Country borders exist to contain the proletariat and allow avenues of escape for the bourgeoisie.

    A government that makes demands of this regime paints a target on their backs.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      they actually are reporting on it much more, and plenty have opened up their own investigations into their people implicated by what’s been released so far

      it’s just that the US’s mainstream news is so captured by special/rich interests that nothing breaks through the american bubble unless the powers that be want it to.

  • Bullerfar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Atleast now we know why they want to create their own rich territory in greenland. Epstein Island 2.0

      • Bullerfar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The techbros has a wet dream about a futuristic society where they can create their own rules and such. A elysium kind of thing, only for the 0,1% riches. They see greenland as a barren country, because to them, a country isnt a country if theres only 60.000 people living there. I don’t know why they havent thought of antartica. But I gues it is too far away from america.

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    To do what with it? Other world governments are more concerned by the fact they keep getting bombed, destabilised and economically coerced by America and friends… The fact that the entire Anglo political structure is composed of murderous, amoral pedos and those who don’t mind it is not a surprise to anyone besides the ones governed by them.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      21 hours ago

      To do what with it?

      Purge their own administrations, presumably.

      But all these people have their own friends, same as Gates and Musk and Jamie Daimon.

  • oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Unwritten rule that rules don’t apply for the top; remember they are better than us ordinary people…